AUTHOR’S STATEMENT :

(please read this before commenting on September Clues, thanks for your time)

This statement is meant to adress a series of -in my view - important issues, given the incredible response SC has had in only a couple of months .The overwhelmingly positive feedback has pleasantly surprised me given the painfully controversial issue this is. I take this as a good sign of the clarity of my research and thank all my supporters for helping me diffuse it - a daunting task indeed...

My   more...motivations are to find solely in my personal quest for justice in the light of the most horrid and murderous hoax of modern times. My relentless 9/11 research (helped on by every single component of the wide 9/11 truth movement) reached its decisive turning point when I started to analyze the footage/audio of the Tv networks’ broadcasts of that fateful day.

I have double-checked every media (i.e.footage/audio material) that has come under my scrutiny and confronted them scrupulously with official television archives, private VHS tapes and other verifiable sources. The authenticity of the TV media used in September Clues (insofar that it was actually broadcast that day) has now been firmly established by a wide array of cross-referenced sources.

I initially hesitated to publish this work on the www – if only for the sheer difficulty of displaying , with the available resolution, some of the more subtle details in this study. For instance, the pixel-overlay of the ‘nose-in/nose-out’ (on SC part1) was unsatisfactory so I have now made a special video - "NOSED OUT" - to illustrate it convincingly in better resolution.

By now, most serious 9/11 researchers will agree that no plane hit the Pentagon and that no sizeable plane debris was found in Shanksville - let alone at Ground Zero. Now, as we analyze the TV broadcasts of that day, what we see emerging is only the continuation of this pattern : no solid, 'slam-dunk' proof of plane debris. Only 'flight175' was broadcast live : in fact, merely three 2sec-clips of bi-dimensional / dark plane-shadows were broadcast on live tv. Keep that in mind : that's a total of 6sec OF LIVE TV footage - which fooled the world.

All the subsequent "plane crash" clips trickled out hours, days if not years later (mostly on the internet). All these (approx. 30) so-called "amateur" clips also show tell-tale signs of forgery but, of course, their relevance in the big picture of 9/11 images pale in comparison to the all-important live TV footage : The latter is almost entirely composed of digital imagery (incl. the Manhattan scenery) as should be clear by the end of this documentary.

I have, of course, drawn a personal conclusion out of this research. I am not, however, pushing any agenda or seeking personal attention. I'm nevertheless putting my twenty years+ of experience in the audio/video field at stake by ruling out beyond any reasonable doubt that the planes shown on tv (and on 'amateur' footage) were real.

What does this mean for the honest, 911 truthseekers ? It simply means having solid, tangible, repeatable proof of foul play – something which has not been available for over six years. This study does NOT invalidate the hard work of the many 911 truthseekers - let this be very clear. This is just the last - and most factual - piece of a frustrating puzzle which has taken too long to assemble.

I will gracefully listen to anyone's objections and suggestions - but I'll ask fellow truthseekers to cut the 'disinfo' accusations. I also understand the shock this is to many people : to realize the extent of human evil and deceit is never a painless process - but don't place the blame on September Clues...

Peace  less

Sources and references to this research : (under completion)


HERE YOU CAN CHECK OUT ALL THE ORIGINAL NEWSCASTS OF 9/11 :
http://www.archive.org/details/sept_11_tv_archive

HERE IS A NEAT, STEP-BY-STEP INTRODUCTION TO THE 9/11 TV HOAX
http://www.911hoax.com/

HERE YOU CAN DOWNLOAD AND CHECK FOR YOURSELF HIGH-RESOLUTION TV BROADCASTS OF 9/11 :
http://911hoax.net/911_News_Broadcasts/

HERE IS A MOST COMPREHENSIVE STUDY OF EYEWITNESSES' REPORTS :
http://stevenwarran.blogspot.com/

HERE IS AN EXCELLENT ALL-ROUND   more...RESEARCH (VIDEOS /PLANNING/ MEDIA PEOPLE INVOLVED) :
http://911logic.blogspot.com/

HERE IS A POINT-BY-POINT ANALYSIS OF MOST "FLIGHT 175" VIDEOS + WITNESS REPORTS
http://www.911research.dsl.pipex.com/ggua175/

HERE IS A COMPREHENSIVE LIST OF ALL EXISTING FOOTAGE OF "2ND PLANE HIT"
http://killtown.911review.org/2nd-hit.html

HERE IS AN IN-DEPTH STUDY OF ALL THE COMPUTER SIMULATED FOOTAGE & IMAGES :
http://www.geocities.com/ua175reflections/

HERE IS A COMPREHENSIVE STUDY OF THE NOSE-OUT SHOT
http://www.acebaker.com/9-11/ABPlaneStudy/Chopper5Velocity2.html

HERE'S AN INSIGHTFUL ARTICLE ABOUT THE ELITE'S
CONTROL OF THE NEWSMEDIA
http://911wasahoax.blogspot.com/2007/02/are-there-elite-in-media.html

HERE IS WHY THE FADE-TO-BLACK ON CNN AND FOX HAS NO RELATION TO WTC1 ANTENNA - AND HOW THE MAJOR NETWORKS OVERTOOK THE AIRWAVES :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_audiovisual_entertainment_a ffected_by_the_September_11,_2001_attacks

HERE'S AN EXCELLENT INSIGHT INTO THE "IMPOSSIBLE FRAMERATE" PLANE
http://911wasahoax.blogspot.com/2006/09/2-second-video-that-tricked-america.html

HERE YOU HAVE A GOOD GENERAL OVERVIEW OF 9/11'S LOOSE ENDS FALLING INTO PLACE
http://911wasahoax.blogspot.com/2006/08/when-all-loose-ends-finally-make-sense.html

HERE ARE FACTS REGARDING THE 4 "PLANES"
http://w ww.arcticbeacon.com/articles/25-nov-2005.html
http://www.serendipity.li/wot/aa_flts/aa_flts.htm

HERE IS A RESEARCH ON THE PUZZLE OF THE UNTRACEABLE AIRPLANE PASSENGERS :
http://newjersey.indymedia.org/or/2005/12/9535.shtml

HERE IS A STUDY ON THE 17 SECONDS DISCREPANCY OF REPORTED IMPACT TIMES:
http://66.102.9.104/search?q=cache:lIB1nDgDujsJ:colorado.indymedia.org/newswire/display/14211/index.php+9:03+SECOND+PLANE+911+SEISMIC&hl=it&ct=clnk&cd=6&gl=it

HERE ARE TIDBITS ABOUT SOME EYE-WITNESSES
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/09/06/earlyshow/main521131.shtml

HERE IS A COMPREHENSIVE VIDEO COMPILATION OF EYE-WITNESS REPORTS (WATCH "911 REALITY" PART1-3) :
http://www.livevideo.com/genghis6199

HERE ARE SOME OFFICIAL TV TRANSCRIPTS:
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0208/17/cp.00.html
http://s3.amazonaws.com/911timeline/2001/cnn091101.html
http://www.fromthewilderness.com/timeline/2001/abcnews091101.html

HERE IS AN ARTICLE ABOUT THE FRENCH FILMMAKERS :
http://www.media-criticism.com/Naudet_Brothers_09_2004.html

HERE IS AN EXCELLENT ARTICLE OF A THINKING MAN'S LOGICAL PATH TO UNDERSTANDING 9/11
http://desip.igc.org/NoPlanesOn911.html

HERE IS THE BEST ARTICLE ON WHY THE TRUTH HAS TAKEN SO LONG TO SEEP OUT
http://nomoregames.net/index.php?page=911&subpage1=closed_minds_on_911

HERE IS THE NORWEGIAN 911 PRESS CONFERENCE GROUP'S PLATFORM - AN OUTSTANDING OVERVIEW OF THE QUESTIONS SURROUNDING THE 9/11 ATTACK :
http://www.911pk-gruppen.no/Plat_ENG.html  less

Important note : having read some comments on well-known sites linking this research to various organizations, I want to stress that :

I am not linked to any special interests or, in fact, to anyone whatsoever. I'm a LONE researcher am not affiliated to organizations of any kind. Of course, I have a few very smart friends out there which have helped me through - you know who you are, I love you all.

Now, if anyone questions the authenticity of the TV footage used for this research - go to the 911   more...Chronology Sources Television Archive it's there for all to see :

http://www.archive.org/details/sept_11_tv_archive

BUT BE WARNED : the entire FOX5 archive has been reconstructed as the original FOX footage contained many inconsistencies ( most notably the "nose-out" fiasco) : Watch "FOXED OUT" part1 & 2

LASTLY : To critics claiming this research may actually HURT the 9/11 truthsearch I ask : Can you disprove any / or even all of the findings in SC ? If not, since when has a smoking gun HURT any criminal investigation ? Of course the collapse of the Twin Towers and WTC7 are impossible - yet has anyone produced PROOF of how it was done in 6+ years ? The rubble is gone, so is the hole in the Pentagon and so is the hole in the Shanksville field. It's all gone.

That is not the case with the TV footage.  less