Sign Up
|
Login
|
Help
|
What's New?
|
Report Bugs
Browse Country
Search for
in
Videos
Channels
People
Groups
Blogs
Music
Friends
LiveShow
HOME
LIVESHOW
VIDEOS
CHANNELS
BLOGS
GROUPS
PEOPLE
LIVESTART
INVITE
My Subscriptions
|
Most Viewed
|
Most Recent
|
Most Discussed
|
Most Hits
|
Most Favorites
|
Recently Featured
|
Recently Viewed
CNN Fake Footage Blasted: More Proof for the Hard Headed
Video Details
43
Hit Votes
Views:
5,610
Comments:
37
Favorited:
28
Add to Favorites
Report Content
Blog Video
Add to Channels
Suggest to Friends
Description:
If only there were some way to know what the view in the park actually looked like on September 11, 2001. Were there trees planted there? Were there
more...
lampposts? If only we knew, then we would finally have proof.
less
Added:
Apr 21, 07
By:
bsregistration
Subscribers:
334
Tags:
cnn
fake
hoax
911
ghostplane
tv fakery
911 octopus
Category:
News
URL:
Embed:
Options
Add thumbnail at the end of your video
Enable Community Links on your player
Enable autoplay on your video
Width:
New Code:
Comments & Responses
Post Comment
Get Graphics
Get Widgets
Text Comment:
2500
characters left
Video Comment:
Add Video Comment
Help
Loading Videos...
Processing...
Saving Comment...
1
2
3
Posted Jul 25, 08 by
andrews27
I appreciate the work of these researchers, and believe faked footage has been used. Is it possible, however, that the disputed CNN footage from Battery Park may have been filmed from atop a news van or even from the upper deck of a docked boat? Serious
more...
replies, please.
less
Processing....
Enter your reply comment:
Processing....
Posted Apr 13, 08 by
airshow
Your overlaps are clearly not of the same location nor of the same focal length. It is clear that some of the overlays are slightly larger, and of a different angle. As much as I think there's real problems with the 9/11 scenario, I do not think you
more...
make the case by overlapping a small portion of a building onto your video.
Your analysis, although at first seems plausible, just does not hold up to scrutiny. Too many doubts once one realizes the focal lengths aren't the same. On one building as an example, the windows are much larger, meaning that the camera was either zoomed in, if taken from the same spot, or that the person was in a different location.
As for the photographer not talking, why would anyone who paid dear money for an exclusive, risk having his future words be taken out of context. I'd shut up too.
The biggest thing you all miss is that the exit point on the side of the building shows a fraction before the a/c is completely engulfed by the building. and considering that a collision with an immovable object will slow it down, and the fact that the a/c is now probably already half it's real length, why would something be propelled forward at a faster rate than the a/c? What could have exited the building faster than the a/c?
If I were a country with oil, or an American, I would sleep with the light on. Be real scared.
less
Processing....
Enter your reply comment:
Processing....
Posted May 29, 07 by
splunk
you are not seriously saying that the second plane DID NOT hit the building? IF not, then what are ya saying?
It's almost as if you wanna discredit the 911-thruthers by making crappy, easily discreditable conspiracy vids.
Personally, I think at most bush
more...
did was some spygame crap let get out of hand, and they conspired after the fact, and i suppose WTC7 FOR SURE was pre-loaded with explosives and WTC1 and 2 ... mmmm likely.
But your story .... nah, not so much
less
Processing....
Enter your reply comment:
Processing....
Posted May 20, 07 by
88hawaii
I'm a photographer myself, and I noticed that in the bottom, there appears to be some type of white statue in the foreground. If you shoot two videos from the same location and height, the foreground, middle-ground, and background will match. In both
more...
videos, the statue in the foreground, the building between the statue & twin towers, and the twin towers are the same scale! That white statue in front is a huge key giveaway.
less
Processing....
Enter your reply comment:
Processing....
Posted May 17, 07 by
JusticeBigamouth
Another excellent video I hope will help others open their minds & eyes to what's been happening since PNAC & the GEG (Great Election Grab) of 2000 & what we don't know about what really happened on 911, (2001 for those Americans shown in another video
more...
who didn't know the year). Anyone who thinks every nation on the planet with a functioning Intelligence Agency didn't send emergency briefings that something is badly wrong with this picture is only fooling themselves & has been brainwiped of any capacity for independent thought. They all knew America was now to be feared for if we allowed our own citizens to die, what value would those in power place on non-American lives? Thanks for pounding on the thick skulls of the Domestic American Sheeple.
JB
less
Processing....
Enter your reply comment:
Processing....
Posted May 16, 07 by
rclark23
I will have to agree with bsregistration,
You have limeted yourself to a shoreline theroy
Watch his vid he posted,, sorry
And lets all focus on blowing their cover as in this video!!
Peace
Processing....
Enter your reply comment:
Processing....
Posted Apr 28, 07 by
xxPeter
Looks like someone at CNN forgot that the Trade Center Bldg. was a lot taller than the building they show to the left. U.S. Citizens should get their heads out of their asses and admit they have been coned good on this one.
Processing....
Enter your reply comment:
Processing....
Posted Apr 25, 07 by
bsregistration
Or maybe a boat?
Processing....
Enter your reply comment:
Processing....
Posted May 3, 07 by
IZAKDAVID13
Great video mate, your best one yet. I was going to reply to SmartAlx comment, but if they look and can't see it even now, there is no use for them.
Processing....
Enter your reply comment:
Processing....
Posted Apr 24, 07 by
SmartAlx
You're looking too hard for conspiracies.
I don't see the problem with this shot. First they *DO* show trees. Second, clearly their shot was taken further back or further up. Perhaps on the top of a news van maybe?
And finally, WHY would they fake it?
more...
Thousands of people witnessed the plane hitting the tower.
Don't get me wrong. I think the government was part of 9-11 too, and I've seen the BBC footage of them reporting building 7 collapsing 23 minutes before it actually did collapse. But in this footage, I don't buy your point. Your angles aren't quite right. And it doesn't take much for a slightly different angle and lens to make a big difference. And YOU SEE THE TREES that you claim are missing. They are just lower, which indicates to me that the camera man was higher up. And that is consistent with the angles.
less
Processing....
Enter your reply comment:
Processing....
Posted Apr 28, 07 by
xxPeter
Yea, a news van just so happen to be taking a stroll in the park at the right time. Look at the footage. The plane nearly misses the building on the left which is much less in height than the strucked building.
Processing....
Enter your reply comment:
Processing....
Posted Apr 25, 07 by
bsregistration
This article examines the surprising adventures of one Stanley Praimnath in the ...
http://members.iinet.net.au/~holmgren/munchausen.html
Processing....
Enter your reply comment:
Processing....
Posted Apr 25, 07 by
bsregistration
check out 911closeup.com and also read any of the many articles which debunk stanley's fantastic story.
Processing....
Enter your reply comment:
Processing....
Posted Apr 25, 07 by
SmartAlx
The planes DID hit the building. There ARE eyewitnesses! According to witness Stanley Praimnath in the second building, he saw the plane approaching.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6708190071483512003 Look at 1 hour and 02 minutes into the
more...
video.
less
Processing....
Enter your reply comment:
Processing....
Posted Apr 25, 07 by
bsregistration
The entire 9/11 hoax rests on the videos they showed on TV. If I am too low and too far forward that means the location for the fake CNN shot would be out over the water in a boat or helicopter. We can see what was there on 9/11 from the live video
more...
shot from Chopper 4. From those locations, the Whitehall Building and Red Building will not show the alignment in the CNN video. Therefore the CNN video is fake, or the Whitehall Building and red building have moved since 9/11.
less
Processing....
Enter your reply comment:
Processing....
Posted Apr 25, 07 by
SmartAlx
This is in response to bsregistration's response. I couldn't reply to yours for some reason.
What do you mean "forget about the trees." The trees in the TV footage prove that the angle is different from your footage. Your angles are absolutely not perfect.
more...
Believe me. I've done my fair share of camera matching for animation scenes. more... Your angles are WAY off. The perspective is different. You were too low and/or too far forward.
And my question wasn't why did the US government attack its own people. My question was why would CNN fake a video? Why would they pick an impossible spot to video? There are plenty other videos showing planes hitting the towers. Whether or not this one is fake proves nothing, only that if it's fake CNN is stupid in more ways than they don't know how to fake a film. The whole idea of faking this film is stupid and completely pointless.
less
Processing....
Enter your reply comment:
Processing....
Posted Apr 24, 07 by
bsregistration
Well, to your first point about tens of thousands of witnesses, that's silly. There are TV eyewitnesses and not live eyewitnesses.
Secondly, they'd fake it because they're part of the operation. The mission was to generate public support for an invasion
more...
of Afghanistan. How can you do that unless we're attacked? But Afghanistan had no way to attack us. So they inveted the whole Bin Laden nonsense using their long-time asset and Bush family friend. It's no secret, they have business dealings going back decades. The Bin Laden family got VIP flights out of the USA after 9/11.
My angles are perfect, and CNN is not-quite-right. Just put up a picture of the "right location" to show us that the CNN shot is even physically possible. Then we'll argue about the rest of the problems in the video. Forget about the trees and focus on the buildings themselves. The buildings are out of position. That's the real smoking gun here.
Thanks for the comment and it's good you're asking questions.
less
Processing....
Enter your reply comment:
Processing....
Posted Apr 23, 07 by
sicizzum
well the trees didnt block the buildings from the still shots. but theres no getting around the scaffolding evidence.
Processing....
Enter your reply comment:
Processing....
Posted Apr 23, 07 by
bsregistration
Yeah, there are clearings in the park where they could have shot the footage if it were real. (but then the tops of the buildings are wrong). The CNN footage is weird. I would love to know exactly how they put it together and what they were thinking.
Processing....
Enter your reply comment:
Processing....
1
2
3
Related
Most Viewed
Most Discussed
By This User
Your Account
My Home
My Mail
My Videos
My Photos
My Blogs
My Groups
Tools
LiveCam (beta)
LiveVideo Lite
LiveVideo Xpress
LiveVideo Layouts
Developers
Promote
RSS
LiveVideo
What's New?
Report Bugs
Contact LiveVideo
Safety Tips
Terms of Service
User Rights Policy
Privacy Policy
Copyright
Sitemap
Support
Account
Channel
Copyright/Content
Director
Troubleshooting
Upload
Videos
© 2010 LiveVideo.com. All Rights Reserved.
Don't see the signup form?
Click here