Sign Up
|
Login
|
Help
|
What's New?
|
Report Bugs
Browse Country
Search for
in
Videos
Channels
People
Groups
Blogs
Music
Friends
LiveShow
HOME
LIVESHOW
VIDEOS
CHANNELS
BLOGS
GROUPS
PEOPLE
LIVESTART
INVITE
My Subscriptions
|
Most Viewed
|
Most Recent
|
Most Discussed
|
Most Hits
|
Most Favorites
|
Recently Featured
|
Recently Viewed
Dr Greg Jenkins - exposed
Video Details
1
Hit Vote
Views:
85
Comments:
3
Favorited:
0
Add to Favorites
Report Content
Blog Video
Add to Channels
Suggest to Friends
Description:
Where is Dr Greg Jenkins now?
Why has he not kept up with the latest 9/11 research posted by Dr Judy Wood?
http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/JJ/
http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/erin/
more...
What was his objective when interviewing Dr Judy Wood? Were his questions really sincere, or did he have another agenda?
It's important to consider all the data before deciding.
This video isolates a few segments from the original version and shows where Greg got uncomfortable
less
Added:
Aug 25, 08
By:
adjuk
Subscribers:
22
Tags:
9/11 greg jenkins judy wood disinfo laser beam energy weapon shill exposed
Category:
Science & Technology
URL:
Embed:
Options
Add thumbnail at the end of your video
Enable Community Links on your player
Enable autoplay on your video
Width:
New Code:
Comments & Responses
Post Comment
Get Graphics
Get Widgets
Text Comment:
2500
characters left
Video Comment:
Add Video Comment
Help
Loading Videos...
Processing...
Saving Comment...
Posted Feb 16, 09 by
Aurigans
Andrew - you will find a very large number of people fitting your 'mould'. They are just finding you a bit of an idiot. That is the consensus view. Unwilling to explain why you are pushing an unintelligible theory on the basis of no evidence, and preferring
more...
instead to question critics' credentials - "where is your website?", etc..
Let me try one more time to explain. An explanatory hypothesis has to be at least basically (a) intelligible and (b) supported by some evidence. Otherwise it is just wacky. You just don't get it, do you?
For example, what are you suggesting is the connection between a hurricane and the Twin Towers? And then what is the evidence to support your hypothesis? Just spell it out for me. I'm listening. Unfortunately you are likely to come back asking for my website - changing the subject. Try to stay focused.
less
Processing....
Enter your reply comment:
Processing....
Posted Feb 16, 09 by
Aurigans
Your attitude is infantile. The video you have contrived is obviously designed to make Greg Jenkins look foolish, but watching the original interview he is anything but. Ms Wood is a complete dunce and a nutter. Let me respond again to your other questions.
more...
1. A laughing matter? - you and Ms Wood, not 9/11.
2. The smoke plumes. What would you expect to be rising into the air from a burning building? Smoke? And what would you expect to be falling? Dust? Rubble? So yes, two types of product. Why would you find a problem with that?
less
Processing....
Enter your reply comment:
Processing....
Posted Feb 16, 09 by
adjuk
Wow - no mention of Hurricane - you haven't told me about your own research and website. You fit the mould well. Goodbye and good luck!
Other readers: visit my website for a more detailed analysis of "the mould".
Aurigans - do you know Greg Jenkins personally?
more...
Indeed, are you Greg Jenkins? Just wondering. You sould a bit like Redlinedmeter who commented on my YouTube posting of this video.
Thanks
less
Processing....
Enter your reply comment:
Processing....
Posted Feb 16, 09 by
Aurigans
Who are you and what research have you done? What's on your 9/11 research website? What articles have you published and what action have you taken?"
This says a lot about your problem. Rather than sit down and have a think about the crap you are putting
more...
out, you prefer to check people's publishing history and website output. That's what you are doing with Ms Wood.
less
Processing....
Enter your reply comment:
Processing....
Posted Feb 16, 09 by
Aurigans
... and I don't comment on Hurricane Erin because I can't even see any intelligible suggestion as to how it might be relevant to 9/11, apart from occurring on the same day and heading towards NY. What sort of relationship are you suggesting?
Processing....
Enter your reply comment:
Processing....
Posted Dec 14, 08 by
Aurigans
Wow ! There is actually someone willing to side with this Kook. I can't believe it. The smoke rising from the collapsing building is the smoke from the fires in the other tower. LOL. The satellite photo shows smoke drifting up into the atmosphere. LOL.
more...
Where is the rest of the building? It is pancaking down the middle of the 'snowball' LOL. Where would you expect it to be? There is only one snowball around here. Judy Woods. She is quite clearly insane. "Are you asking these questions for sincere honest purposes?" LOL.
less
Processing....
Enter your reply comment:
Processing....
Posted Feb 16, 09 by
adjuk
"LOL" - presumably you think this is a laughing matter then?
Processing....
Enter your reply comment:
Processing....
Posted Feb 16, 09 by
adjuk
Oops - no real evidence discussed here. There are 2 parts to the plume if you look carefully - which is dust and which is smoke?
Like almost everyone else, you don't comment on Hurricane Erin?
Who's kook? Who are you and what research have you done? What's
more...
on your 9/11 research website? What articles have you published and what action have you taken?
less
Processing....
Enter your reply comment:
Processing....
Related
Most Viewed
Most Discussed
By This User
Your Account
My Home
My Mail
My Videos
My Photos
My Blogs
My Groups
Tools
LiveCam (beta)
LiveVideo Lite
LiveVideo Xpress
LiveVideo Layouts
Developers
Promote
RSS
LiveVideo
What's New?
Report Bugs
Contact LiveVideo
Safety Tips
Terms of Service
User Rights Policy
Privacy Policy
Copyright
Sitemap
Support
Account
Channel
Copyright/Content
Director
Troubleshooting
Upload
Videos
© 2009 LiveVideo.com. All Rights Reserved.
Don't see the signup form?
Click here