Stills from a soon to be released video.......Park Forman's? I'm not sure.

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/...

http://www.af.mil/news/airman/0296/du...

http://youtube.com/watch?v=wtMN7jhmAFU

http://youtube.com/watch?v=H-OtoMVBnoE

Please check out my new website:

www.septemberclues.info

The myriad of theories surrounding 9/11 have served the perpetrators well for over 7 years, giving the false impression freedom of speech was alive   more...and well but ultimately spreading an almost mindnumbing confusion.
Most "911truth" organizations are run by the same people who organised this sham. This in order to 'control' the opposition, for as long as possible, in the hope it would all fade away one day in the public consciousness.
As most theories have built on the false assumption that airplanes were involved, the 'plane' myth has held strong - in spite of the widespread understanding no airliner crashed at the Pentagon or in Shanksville.
The misheld belief that 'thousands of Newyorkers' saw passenger planes crash into the twin towers is upheld solely by the relentless pounding of the mainstream media, the higher levels of which have complied to the requirements of this military false-flag operation.
Virtually all firsthand witnesses to the first "plane" were newspeople as shown in SEPTEMBER CLUESpart D. As for the second "plane", MOST witnesses on the street reported 'a SMALL PLANE' or even 'A MISSILE' . These reports were actually aired on the day but never again. Of course, a plane-shaped cruise missile with wings and tail section (such as a JASSM cruise missile) would be perceived as a 'small plane' to most people :in fact, a study of 12000 pages of testimonies has determined the majority of eyewitnesses reported a small aircraft - NOT a large airliner.
In SEPTEMBER CLUES part F we see that the alleged authors of the "amateur" videos ALSO were people linked to the newsmedia / film and video industry. All of those clips are, by now, proven forgeries : Many turn out to be simply cropped duplicates of the same composite, while most disqualify each other by the way of unconcilable differences : trajectories, angles, pitch, yaw, speeds, lighting, hues - you name it. The few clips showing the actual 'plane' penetration depict a wide body (aluminum) airliner penetrating the steel-frame tower effortlessly without even the brittle tail section breaking off. This is of course utterly absurd and makes a joke of the laws of physics.
The current reluctance of most people to recognize and accept this research is - in many ways - understandable, the foremost cause being the massive conditioning power of the mainstream newsmedia.
However, the many mistakes made by the authors of these crude fabrications (which included digital simulations of the Manhattan landscape) will not stand the test of time. This branch of 9/11 truth research is naturally being vigorously attacked and billed as "disinformation" - as it contains the only tangible and repeatable proof of this murderous hoax : with no rubble to analyze and only speculation to go on, no one is going to prove HOW 3 towers collapsed nor IF or WHY a Norad standdown was ordered. On the other hand, the evidence of TV fakery cannot be suppressed no matter how hard the perpetrators may try.
There is no such thing as 'the perfect crime'.  less

Please check out my new website:

www.septemberclues.info

On 9/11, the US TV networks used computer generated sceneries of Manhattan. Multiple layering techniques and softwares were employed to simulate   more..."airplanes crashing into the World Trade Center". We now have conclusive evidence that the TV networks aired manipulated images live on 9/11. The subsequent so-called "amateur" videos were more sophisticated video composites yet all have now been exposed for what they are : total forgeries.  less

decide for yourself
...but don`t forget the laws of physics!

http://911taboo.com

VideoPage
http://911taboo.magnify.net

Forum
http://z15.invisionfree.com/911taboo

http://torrentfish.blogspot.com

http://clitorrent.blogspot.com
  more...
http://livevideo.com/socialservice

http://911Revolution.magnify.ne  less

As i was watching a little video I made for 9-11 I saw something really really weird that I haven't noticed before untill seeing the 'september clues' series. It is way to fast for a helicopter, and leaves   more...trailers behind, and seems to move through all the smoke trying to be camouflaged. Maybe you good government agents can tell me What it isn't. A weather balloon? Was it Santa Claus? Wtf??  less