video concerning the "PNAC" and it's elite agenda for world domination.

The Project for the New American Century is a neo-conservative group who may have planned the War in Iraq back in 1997.

McCain asked about PNAC and 911 at town hall

http://www.newamericancentury.org/

PNAC ring leader William Kristol confronted on 911 by the Infowars team Pt2

Lt. Col. Karen Kwiatkowski tells why she won't let her kids join the military.

http://www.newamericancentury.org/

PNAC ring leader William Kristol confronted on 911 Pt3

PNAC ring leader William Kristol confronted on 911 by the Infowars team Pt1

This is the final vesion of Ry Dawson from www.anti-neo-cons.com Video
All roads lead to Israel
What really happened on 911? Over 82% of Americans according to polls conducted by CNN believe that the official   more...story of 911 is false and that the government is part of a cover up. There seem to be four main 911 theories, one form the main stream press and the 911 commission and others from researchers who bothered to look at things like phsycal evidence, the paper trail, and the money trail. I have a fifth theory which unifies the war in Iraq with the cabal that planned 911. The 4 theories breifly go as follows.Some "911 was an inside job" camps like to lay out 4 scenarios. Briefly they go as follows.

1 Is the official story.
We got caught with our pants down and terrorists did 911. And the wars in the Middle East are part of the greater war on terrorism.

2 The incompetence excuse
There was information available about the coming attacks but because of our incompetence we failed to see it. Terrorists attacked the US. And the wars in the Middle East were based on mistakes (more incompetence) but now we got to stay.

3 They let it happen
They knew full well about the coming 911 attacks but allowed it to happen in order to use it as a pretext to go to war with Iraq and Afghanistan as it was in military and corporate interests (particularly oil) to do so.

4 They made it happen. (They meaning just vaguely the Bush Admin)
The Bush government either helped protect the terrorists or simply used them as patsies, and assisted the plane crashes effects with bombs placed inside the towers prior to 911. The wars in the Middle East were about oil.

The 911 was an inside job camps then say the evidence must land you somewhere between 3 and 4 with more research dropping you firmly on number 4. Let me now throw in a 5th scenario

5 The Neocons Made it happen with the assistance of a foreign government, the same government where PNAC's papers were first written, and the same foregn nation who we have caught spies from who have been stealing secrets from the US about Iran, and who made up the shadow government of the OSP which is who cherry picked and fabricated the lies told about Iraq in order to start that war. The Wars in the Middle East were for separate reasons, Afghanistan was about a few pipelines as noted but more so about controlling large quantities of un-tapped uranium (a reason for both the Russian and US invasions) and secondly for controlling opium as the CIA uses drug money to fund it's off the book black operations such as the now known massive secret prison systems, (torture camps and human medical/scientific testing). Location-wise Afghanistan is coupled with other color coded revolutions to circle China and Russia with US bases and puppets, (add to that the lesser known negotiations with Japan to allow nuclear subs into the Japanese Sea [pointed at China] in exchange for moving troops from Okinawa to Guam). The main goal however, which the PNAC think tank states, is to keep the eye on the pie: Iran, which Afghanistan and Iraq both boarder. The invasion of Iraq was to solve Israel's oil crisis and stop the threat of a secular Middle East which would become a true economic player and was a threat to the aggressive state of Israel.

The evidence if it was ALL being stated, especially pertaining to the war in Iraq, would land you in scenario 5. To better understand the Iraq War and why the US invaded go here.  less

This is the final vesion of Ry Dawson from www.anti-neo-cons.com Video
All roads lead to Israel
What really happened on 911? Over 82% of Americans according to polls conducted by CNN believe that the official   more...story of 911 is false and that the government is part of a cover up. There seem to be four main 911 theories, one form the main stream press and the 911 commission and others from researchers who bothered to look at things like phsycal evidence, the paper trail, and the money trail. I have a fifth theory which unifies the war in Iraq with the cabal that planned 911. The 4 theories breifly go as follows.Some "911 was an inside job" camps like to lay out 4 scenarios. Briefly they go as follows.

1 Is the official story.
We got caught with our pants down and terrorists did 911. And the wars in the Middle East are part of the greater war on terrorism.

2 The incompetence excuse
There was information available about the coming attacks but because of our incompetence we failed to see it. Terrorists attacked the US. And the wars in the Middle East were based on mistakes (more incompetence) but now we got to stay.

3 They let it happen
They knew full well about the coming 911 attacks but allowed it to happen in order to use it as a pretext to go to war with Iraq and Afghanistan as it was in military and corporate interests (particularly oil) to do so.

4 They made it happen. (They meaning just vaguely the Bush Admin)
The Bush government either helped protect the terrorists or simply used them as patsies, and assisted the plane crashes effects with bombs placed inside the towers prior to 911. The wars in the Middle East were about oil.

The 911 was an inside job camps then say the evidence must land you somewhere between 3 and 4 with more research dropping you firmly on number 4. Let me now throw in a 5th scenario

5 The Neocons Made it happen with the assistance of a foreign government, the same government where PNAC's papers were first written, and the same foregn nation who we have caught spies from who have been stealing secrets from the US about Iran, and who made up the shadow government of the OSP which is who cherry picked and fabricated the lies told about Iraq in order to start that war. The Wars in the Middle East were for separate reasons, Afghanistan was about a few pipelines as noted but more so about controlling large quantities of un-tapped uranium (a reason for both the Russian and US invasions) and secondly for controlling opium as the CIA uses drug money to fund it's off the book black operations such as the now known massive secret prison systems, (torture camps and human medical/scientific testing). Location-wise Afghanistan is coupled with other color coded revolutions to circle China and Russia with US bases and puppets, (add to that the lesser known negotiations with Japan to allow nuclear subs into the Japanese Sea [pointed at China] in exchange for moving troops from Okinawa to Guam). The main goal however, which the PNAC think tank states, is to keep the eye on the pie: Iran, which Afghanistan and Iraq both boarder. The invasion of Iraq was to solve Israel's oil crisis and stop the threat of a secular Middle East which would become a true economic player and was a threat to the aggressive state of Israel.

The evidence if it was ALL being stated, especially pertaining to the war in Iraq, would land you in scenario 5. To better understand the Iraq War and why the US invaded go here.  less

This is the final vesion of Ry Dawson from www.anti-neo-cons.com Video
All roads lead to Israel
What really happened on 911? Over 82% of Americans according to polls conducted by CNN believe that the official   more...story of 911 is false and that the government is part of a cover up. There seem to be four main 911 theories, one form the main stream press and the 911 commission and others from researchers who bothered to look at things like phsycal evidence, the paper trail, and the money trail. I have a fifth theory which unifies the war in Iraq with the cabal that planned 911. The 4 theories breifly go as follows.Some "911 was an inside job" camps like to lay out 4 scenarios. Briefly they go as follows.

1 Is the official story.
We got caught with our pants down and terrorists did 911. And the wars in the Middle East are part of the greater war on terrorism.

2 The incompetence excuse
There was information available about the coming attacks but because of our incompetence we failed to see it. Terrorists attacked the US. And the wars in the Middle East were based on mistakes (more incompetence) but now we got to stay.

3 They let it happen
They knew full well about the coming 911 attacks but allowed it to happen in order to use it as a pretext to go to war with Iraq and Afghanistan as it was in military and corporate interests (particularly oil) to do so.

4 They made it happen. (They meaning just vaguely the Bush Admin)
The Bush government either helped protect the terrorists or simply used them as patsies, and assisted the plane crashes effects with bombs placed inside the towers prior to 911. The wars in the Middle East were about oil.

The 911 was an inside job camps then say the evidence must land you somewhere between 3 and 4 with more research dropping you firmly on number 4. Let me now throw in a 5th scenario

5 The Neocons Made it happen with the assistance of a foreign government, the same government where PNAC's papers were first written, and the same foregn nation who we have caught spies from who have been stealing secrets from the US about Iran, and who made up the shadow government of the OSP which is who cherry picked and fabricated the lies told about Iraq in order to start that war. The Wars in the Middle East were for separate reasons, Afghanistan was about a few pipelines as noted but more so about controlling large quantities of un-tapped uranium (a reason for both the Russian and US invasions) and secondly for controlling opium as the CIA uses drug money to fund it's off the book black operations such as the now known massive secret prison systems, (torture camps and human medical/scientific testing). Location-wise Afghanistan is coupled with other color coded revolutions to circle China and Russia with US bases and puppets, (add to that the lesser known negotiations with Japan to allow nuclear subs into the Japanese Sea [pointed at China] in exchange for moving troops from Okinawa to Guam). The main goal however, which the PNAC think tank states, is to keep the eye on the pie: Iran, which Afghanistan and Iraq both boarder. The invasion of Iraq was to solve Israel's oil crisis and stop the threat of a secular Middle East which would become a true economic player and was a threat to the aggressive state of Israel.

The evidence if it was ALL being stated, especially pertaining to the war in Iraq, would land you in scenario 5. To better understand the Iraq War and why the US invaded go here.  less

This is the final vesion of Ry Dawson from www.anti-neo-cons.com Video
All roads lead to Israel
What really happened on 911? Over 82% of Americans according to polls conducted by CNN believe that the official   more...story of 911 is false and that the government is part of a cover up. There seem to be four main 911 theories, one form the main stream press and the 911 commission and others from researchers who bothered to look at things like phsycal evidence, the paper trail, and the money trail. I have a fifth theory which unifies the war in Iraq with the cabal that planned 911. The 4 theories breifly go as follows.Some "911 was an inside job" camps like to lay out 4 scenarios. Briefly they go as follows.

1 Is the official story.
We got caught with our pants down and terrorists did 911. And the wars in the Middle East are part of the greater war on terrorism.

2 The incompetence excuse
There was information available about the coming attacks but because of our incompetence we failed to see it. Terrorists attacked the US. And the wars in the Middle East were based on mistakes (more incompetence) but now we got to stay.

3 They let it happen
They knew full well about the coming 911 attacks but allowed it to happen in order to use it as a pretext to go to war with Iraq and Afghanistan as it was in military and corporate interests (particularly oil) to do so.

4 They made it happen. (They meaning just vaguely the Bush Admin)
The Bush government either helped protect the terrorists or simply used them as patsies, and assisted the plane crashes effects with bombs placed inside the towers prior to 911. The wars in the Middle East were about oil.

The 911 was an inside job camps then say the evidence must land you somewhere between 3 and 4 with more research dropping you firmly on number 4. Let me now throw in a 5th scenario

5 The Neocons Made it happen with the assistance of a foreign government, the same government where PNAC's papers were first written, and the same foregn nation who we have caught spies from who have been stealing secrets from the US about Iran, and who made up the shadow government of the OSP which is who cherry picked and fabricated the lies told about Iraq in order to start that war. The Wars in the Middle East were for separate reasons, Afghanistan was about a few pipelines as noted but more so about controlling large quantities of un-tapped uranium (a reason for both the Russian and US invasions) and secondly for controlling opium as the CIA uses drug money to fund it's off the book black operations such as the now known massive secret prison systems, (torture camps and human medical/scientific testing). Location-wise Afghanistan is coupled with other color coded revolutions to circle China and Russia with US bases and puppets, (add to that the lesser known negotiations with Japan to allow nuclear subs into the Japanese Sea [pointed at China] in exchange for moving troops from Okinawa to Guam). The main goal however, which the PNAC think tank states, is to keep the eye on the pie: Iran, which Afghanistan and Iraq both boarder. The invasion of Iraq was to solve Israel's oil crisis and stop the threat of a secular Middle East which would become a true economic player and was a threat to the aggressive state of Israel.

The evidence if it was ALL being stated, especially pertaining to the war in Iraq, would land you in scenario 5. To better understand the Iraq War and why the US invaded go here.  less

War Party BBC Panorama studies the Neo-Conservative Project for a New American Century (PNAC) and it's influence over the US government on foreign policy.

A critique of Nextel's "9|11" play - how editing of the Naudet film was used to make Americans think everyone in NYC saw the attacks, and rally around a self-destructive "anti-terrorist"   more...campaign.  less

911, Iraq, PNAC, where do all the Roads Lead?
There have been many theories about the 911 and this documentary is made to point out who is the guilty. who really did it.

PNAC exploitation of the revolution in military affairs and conflicts other than war

Beat/Lyrics by (me) Maxwell, 03' recording

----------sing-a-long-----------

militia men, chainsaws, 500 cee cee's
chew drippin from their chins spittin war mumblins
ready with their rape murder cults begin   more...plunderin

cia porn touture tactic volume one rapes
passion for his hobbies but expandable stop leaks
abu grad magazine favorite jellys vasoline
sittin on his phalic S & M they wanna see the tape

gotcha back Ashcroft, sex fienes with pig wings
getcha boys younge Yale moldin' future closet queens
spineless cant die yet, eat a DU shell of chow
infected with a 30mm one round

process of conception null and void genocides now
smile at the headline crack jokes like its dinner time
play the HARRP in alaska in remote coutry sides
tempeture drop two, they uprock, boogaloo

say pieces fall where they must, contracts to the clean dust
worried bout bush dont like black people
im worried bout the ___ who dont like people (more)  less

9/11, Islamic extremism and terrorism are now all synonymous. But what if 9/11 was not the work of Arab extremists? What if it was something far more sinister – an evil contrived from within?

Video Israel Doesn't Want You to See from CBC. This will never be shown on American TV networks.

"Although seriously injured, the young boy disappeared from the hospital before more data could be gathered. No doubt, he was trying to carry on his mission to warn others, substituting for the   more...agony of war...a self-inflicted agony we call the "Cassandra Complex".
  less

WWW.PNACATTACK.COM

Watch this video- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7NefExHDu3s
Either the time is wrong on the video and that is NOT bldg.7 to the right of her head OR it IS. If it IS, then the BBC knew that bldg.7 was   more...going to be demolished and no-one can trust anything they hear from any of the news media because they are all involved in a massive conspiracy.
This video makes the BBC out to be accessories to murder. It seems to me that this theory of could be proven by simply finding out where the segment from New York was filmed, go back there and look to see if indeed that is (or was) bldg 7. Point a camera, match up the camera shot and there you have it, proof. That either IS bldg 7 or it ISN'T, your theory can be proved or disproved beyond a shadow of a doubt.  less

This is a video response to TheCharmingDeviant’s video “A follow-up to “the Collapse”” on YouTube. For me, context is everything, DiMartini and other architects that boasted (pre-9/11) of the WTC Towers   more...strength and survivability where talking about "hits from airliners" that were accidental or inadvertent. The only comparable event was the WW2 era Bomber plane that strayed into NYC in a dense fog and accidentally hit the Empire State Bldg. The Architects never planned on a plane hitting the towers at FULL SPEED! Speed is the crucial factor here, more speed, more kinetic energy.
They simply didn’t anticipate that fully fueled planes would ever be flown at maximum speed into the WTC Towers or any bldg. for that matter. The speed of the jets along with their massive fuel capacity was a one-two punch that the Towers could not withstand. All that kinetic energy blasted away the insulation on the beams, provided that there was adequate fire insulation to begin with. DiMartini was talking about slow speed, accidental hits, not high speed intentional hits.
I don’t think that fireman Joe Casaliggi was saying that these supposed “controlled demolitions” were the “cause” of the small size of the debris found in the aftermath of the collapse. Joe was simply explaining what he saw and experienced as he and his fellow firefighters worked “the pile”, I think you may be reading too much into he’s saying. If you have some other clip where Joe Casaliggi says, “I believe that controlled demolitions brought down the towers”, I’ll stand corrected.
As far as these supposed “secondary explosions” that directly preceded the collapse of each tower, I’ve seen the same thing happen in catastrophic building fires, on a smaller scale of course. Just before collapse, there were open rooms and spaces in the towers that were full of smoke and fire. As the weight of the upper floors bore down on the fire softened steel, the building started to collapse. That creates overpressure, as the towers come down, smoke and flame are pushed out.
The reporter in the chopper was reporting what he “thought” was an explosion, and I’ll admit that the massive over pressure of the collapse and the subsequent fire and smoke that were ejected, looked like an explosion. But, explosions are unique, they create seismic forces that can be seen and measured. I’m sure that things were popping all over in the fires and that the firefighters did hear explosion, I contend that they were not demolition charges.  less