A neoconservative talks about neoconservatism in DC (August 2006 at the Hudson Institute)

It is time for America to wake up and take our great country back!

This is not an endorsement of Obama or McCain but a look at the supporters of a broken down neo-conservative platform.
Clips from
The McCain-Palin Mob
The Sidewalk to Nowhere
Obama Yard Signs Being Torched   more...in St. Peters MO  less

A recent Austin-American Statesman review of Neo-Con Philip Bobbitt's new book Terror and Consent features an image of a shredded Constitution under the words "Everything must go," which acts   more...as a suitable entre to a disgusting diatribe which praises Bobbitt's call for the end of America and its replacement with a de facto world government in the name of fighting terror.
The words, "How to Fight Terrorism" are in place of a torn piece of the Bill of Rights.
Reviewer James E. McWilliams describes Bobbitt as "a distinguished lecturer and senior fellow at the University of Texas and a law professor at Columbia University," but anyone with a basic grasp of what America's founders envisioned and what Ronald Reagan later termed the "shining city on a hill" would be more apt to describe Bobbitt - nephew of Lyndon Baines Johnson and former State Department counselor - as an enemy of the Republic.

McWilliams' fawning review of the book is intended to sucker in millionaire pseudo-intellectuals who think they are part of the elite by using mental gymnastics and brazenly contradictory statements in order to justifying the revolting underlying premise of the book.

As soon as we learn that the facade of Bobbitt's argument is to provide a solution "for fighting the wars that are bound to plague the 21st century," we're already safe in the knowledge that Bobbitt represents another chicken-necked warhawk who has already claimed ownership of the next 10 decades for his Neo-Con ideological fetish of imperial bloodletting and brutal domination.

So what exactly is Bobbitt's solution?

The complete obliteration of sovereignty and the nation state and its replacement with a new "order that takes its structural cues from multinational corporations and nongovernmental organizations" that will have the power to pursue "more aggressive tactics of preclusionary warfare," meaning more pre-emptive invasions of broken-backed third world countries to expand the creaking pax-Americana empire.

Despite terse and contradictory promises that we will still have some semblance of freedom in Bobbitt's technocracy, he admits that there will be "no obvious answer to many of the human rights issues that are bound to arise," as a result of his plan to completely eviscerate God-given freedoms enumerated in the Constitution and Bill of Rights.
The reviewer cites Bobbitt's justification to impose world government as a means of combating,"The accessibility of weapons of mass destruction, the globalization of international capital and the "universalization of culture" have eroded the conventional borders that once legitimated national security," all problems that were created by globalists' drive to impose centralized systems of control in the first place by creating crises and then posing as the saviors.
This is another classic example of problem-reaction-solution. Use the pretext of the problems you have created to then offer a solution that befits your ultimate agenda - global government.
Philip Bobbitt:
Phone: (512) 232-1376
Fax: (512) 471-6988
E-mail: PBOBBITT@LAW.UTEXAS.EDU
If you contact Bobbitt, please be polite in your disagreement.
  less

PLEASE ELECT THIS MAN TO PRESIDENT!!!!!!
Gets really good around 10:08, every American should have a listen.
Video of Congressman <a href"http://www.RonPaul.org">Ron Paul's </a><br><br>Ron   more...Paul's Neo-Conned speech he gave on the House floor on July 10, 2003.
  less

PLEASE ELECT THIS MAN TO PRESIDENT!!!!!!
Gets really good around 10:08, every American should have a listen.
Video of Congressman <a href"http://www.RonPaul.org">Ron Paul's </a><br><br><a   more...href="http://www.livevideo.com/video/ConspiracyCentral/42BDA98752BF462B8BFEA599362E8E11/ron-paul-famous-neo-conned-s.aspx">Part 2 </a>
Ron Paul's Neo-Conned speech he gave on the House floor on July 10, 2003.
  less

The Neo-Con Fox Fascistbitch Michelle Malkin confronted with Alex Jones Part 1

Keith Olbermann gives his take on Mc Cains presidential bid and his attacks on Obama. Keith Olbermann tells it as he sees it... I love this guy!

Should we be worried about the threat from organised terrorism or is it simply a phantom menace being used to stop society from falling apart?
In the past our politicians offered us dreams of a better   more...world. Now they promise to protect us from nightmares.

The most frightening of these is the threat of an international terror network. But just as the dreams were not true, neither are these nightmares.

In a new series, the Power of Nightmares explores how the idea that we are threatened by a hidden and organized terrorist network is an illusion.

It is a myth that has spread unquestioned through politics, the security services and the international media. At the heart of the story are two groups: the American neo-conservatives and the radical Islamists.
Both were idealists who were born out of the failure of the liberal dream to build a better world.
These two groups have changed the world but not in the way either intended.
Together they created today's nightmare vision of an organised terror network.
A fantasy that politicians then found restored their power and authority in a disillusioned age. Those with the darkest fears became the most powerful.
The rise of the politics of fear begins in 1949 with two men whose radical ideas would inspire the attack of 9/11 and influence the neo-conservative movement that dominates Washington.

Both these men believed that modern liberal freedoms were eroding the bonds that held society together.

The two movements they inspired set out, in their different ways, to rescue their societies from this decay. But in an age of growing disillusion with politics, the neo-conservatives turned to fear in order to pursue their vision.

They would create a hidden network of evil run by the Soviet Union that only they could see.

The Islamists were faced by the refusal of the masses to follow their dream and began to turn to terror to force the people to "see the truth"'.  less

<B>Read Description for a link to pt 2</b>
Should we be worried about the threat from organised terrorism or is it simply a phantom menace being used to stop society from falling apart?
In the   more...past our politicians offered us dreams of a better world. Now they promise to protect us from nightmares.
<a href="http://www.livevideo.com/video/ConspiracyCentral/3E249298C4A94928854CE6F5F66BDB38/the-power-of-nightmares-part.aspx">Click Here for pt 2</a>
The most frightening of these is the threat of an international terror network. But just as the dreams were not true, neither are these nightmares.

In a new series, the Power of Nightmares explores how the idea that we are threatened by a hidden and organized terrorist network is an illusion.

It is a myth that has spread unquestioned through politics, the security services and the international media. At the heart of the story are two groups: the American neo-conservatives and the radical Islamists.
Both were idealists who were born out of the failure of the liberal dream to build a better world.
These two groups have changed the world but not in the way either intended.
Together they created today's nightmare vision of an organised terror network.
A fantasy that politicians then found restored their power and authority in a disillusioned age. Those with the darkest fears became the most powerful.
The rise of the politics of fear begins in 1949 with two men whose radical ideas would inspire the attack of 9/11 and influence the neo-conservative movement that dominates Washington.

Both these men believed that modern liberal freedoms were eroding the bonds that held society together.

The two movements they inspired set out, in their different ways, to rescue their societies from this decay. But in an age of growing disillusion with politics, the neo-conservatives turned to fear in order to pursue their vision.

They would create a hidden network of evil run by the Soviet Union that only they could see.

The Islamists were faced by the refusal of the masses to follow their dream and began to turn to terror to force the people to "see the truth"'.  less

<b>Read Description for a link to part 2</b>
Should we be worried about the threat from organised terrorism or is it simply a phantom menace being used to stop society from falling apart?
In   more...the past our politicians offered us dreams of a better world. Now they promise to protect us from nightmares.
<a href="http://www.livevideo.com/video/ConspiracyCentral/7EC271C03F7440EBBEA63A15609BF2E2/the-power-of-nightmares-part.aspx">Click Here</a> for the third installment of this video series.<br>
The most frightening of these is the threat of an international terror network. But just as the dreams were not true, neither are these nightmares.

In a new series, the Power of Nightmares explores how the idea that we are threatened by a hidden and organised terrorist network is an illusion.

It is a myth that has spread unquestioned through politics, the security services and the international media. At the heart of the story are two groups: the American neo-conservatives and the radical Islamists.
Both were idealists who were born out of the failure of the liberal dream to build a better world.
These two groups have changed the world but not in the way either intended.
Together they created today's nightmare vision of an organised terror network.
A fantasy that politicians then found restored their power and authority in a disillusioned age. Those with the darkest fears became the most powerful.
The rise of the politics of fear begins in 1949 with two men whose radical ideas would inspire the attack of 9/11 and influence the neo-conservative movement that dominates Washington.

Both these men believed that modern liberal freedoms were eroding the bonds that held society together.

The two movements they inspired set out, in their different ways, to rescue their societies from this decay. But in an age of growing disillusion with politics, the neo-conservatives turned to fear in order to pursue their vision.

They would create a hidden network of evil run by the Soviet Union that only they could see.

The Islamists were faced by the refusal of the masses to follow their dream and began to turn to terror to force the people to "see the truth"'.  less

<B>Read Description for a link to pt 2</b>
Should we be worried about the threat from organised terrorism or is it simply a phantom menace being used to stop society from falling apart?
In the   more...past our politicians offered us dreams of a better world. Now they promise to protect us from nightmares.
<a href="http://www.livevideo.com/video/ConspiracyCentral/7F6EE953B45642F3B5FDDC46EACEA3A6/the-power-of-nightmares-part-2.aspx">Click Here for pt 2</a>

The most frightening of these is the threat of an international terror network. But just as the dreams were not true, neither are these nightmares.

In a new series, the Power of Nightmares explores how the idea that we are threatened by a hidden and organised terrorist network is an illusion.

It is a myth that has spread unquestioned through politics, the security services and the international media. At the heart of the story are two groups: the American neo-conservatives and the radical Islamists.
Both were idealists who were born out of the failure of the liberal dream to build a better world.
These two groups have changed the world but not in the way either intended.
Together they created today's nightmare vision of an organised terror network.
A fantasy that politicians then found restored their power and authority in a disillusioned age. Those with the darkest fears became the most powerful.
The rise of the politics of fear begins in 1949 with two men whose radical ideas would inspire the attack of 9/11 and influence the neo-conservative movement that dominates Washington.

Both these men believed that modern liberal freedoms were eroding the bonds that held society together.

The two movements they inspired set out, in their different ways, to rescue their societies from this decay. But in an age of growing disillusion with politics, the neo-conservatives turned to fear in order to pursue their vision.

They would create a hidden network of evil run by the Soviet Union that only they could see.

The Islamists were faced by the refusal of the masses to follow their dream and began to turn to terror to force the people to "see the truth"'.  less

<b>Read Description for a link to the second installment of this amazing 3 part documentary</b>
Should we be worried about the threat from organised terrorism or is it simply a phantom menace   more...being used to stop society from falling apart?
In the past our politicians offered us dreams of a better world. Now they promise to protect us from nightmares.
<a href="http://www.livevideo.com/video/ConspiracyCentral/96F817E5536D4161AF78E445C46B6973/the-power-of-nightmares-part-2.aspx">Click Here</a> for the second installment of this video

The most frightening of these is the threat of an international terror network. But just as the dreams were not true, neither are these nightmares.

In a new series, the Power of Nightmares explores how the idea that we are threatened by a hidden and organised terrorist network is an illusion.

It is a myth that has spread unquestioned through politics, the security services and the international media. At the heart of the story are two groups: the American neo-conservatives and the radical Islamists.
Both were idealists who were born out of the failure of the liberal dream to build a better world.
These two groups have changed the world but not in the way either intended.
Together they created today's nightmare vision of an organised terror network.
A fantasy that politicians then found restored their power and authority in a disillusioned age. Those with the darkest fears became the most powerful.
The rise of the politics of fear begins in 1949 with two men whose radical ideas would inspire the attack of 9/11 and influence the neo-conservative movement that dominates Washington.

Both these men believed that modern liberal freedoms were eroding the bonds that held society together.

The two movements they inspired set out, in their different ways, to rescue their societies from this decay. But in an age of growing disillusion with politics, the neo-conservatives turned to fear in order to pursue their vision.

They would create a hidden network of evil run by the Soviet Union that only they could see.

The Islamists were faced by the refusal of the masses to follow their dream and began to turn to terror to force the people to "see the truth"'.  less

Is Barack Obama a Neo-Con?

"...Just the other day, I was speaking to someone, who coincidentally voted for Obama. This bozo informed me that falling gas prices was just a conspiracy by oil companies   more...to help elect John McCain. He didn't realize that real demand was falling for oil because the economy was sliding into recession. He didn't realize that falling prices can be an indicator of deflation. I informed him that we may be headed into deflation. He replied simply, quote-unquote "GOOD" as if to imply that he thought deflation being the opposite of inflation being inherently evil meant that deflation could only be the opposite. I didn't go into a discussion about how Deflation is actually worse than inflation. That's heresy to people like him. After all, his world is still flat and he might come to fisticuffs if I attempt to tell him it's round. With Deflation, Yes, prices go down, but the nasty thing is that this includes the 'price' someone can pay for your labor. Fixed Debts like Mortgages and Car payments do not go down.Demand for goods fall. It doesn't matter if gas drops to, say, $2.00. If layoffs happen in good industries due to decreased demand, those forced out will eventually accept jobs that don't pay as much. Prices plunge further, forcing more unemployment, Wash, Rinse, Repeat. $2.00 gas ends up costing more in relative terms when one only makes 1/3 or 1/4 of what they were when gas was $4.00. falling prices cause many industries to cut production on unfinished goods because cost to finish them is sometimes than what they can be sold for. During the Depression, farmers plowed fields under, they dumped milk onto the ground. They don't call Economics the dismal Science for no reason..."  less

All Because Of You

Ever wanted to see me draw characters from my "Chess Piece" fancomic? Well then, say no more. Using my sister's digi-cam, I recorded myself doing so. First off, the brief introduction. I regret   more...not being able to show you more of my art stuff--I was going to by the end, but my sis' digi-cam's memory was full. Maybe next time.  less

montaje en el que se enfrentan neo de Matrix v/s robocop entre otros ;aparecen tambien ,bueno hay que verlo ...........

MISH MASH from MelleBelle
http://www.livevideo.com/MelleBelle

A very important 2006 talk with Greg Palast. The Iraq war was never about getting the oil, it was about stopping the oil to raise prices.

Alex Jones going into detail about fake Neo-Con tapes of Bin Laden, which the Government uses anytime they want to scare the population.

MISH MASH

con

con

con