Just watched an "live feed" from ABC at 8:06:10 where we are supposed to see parts of the chopper "legs" getting caught in the camera.
The chopper seems to make make maybe a 90 degree   more...right turn, yet the focus of the camera on WTC dosen't move an inch. That would be an amazingly coordinated teamwork between the pilot and the cameraoperator!

Consider those guys supposedly in the chopper circeling around in the sky feeding the live coverage. Never once out of target Sometimes we see the towes "swaying" form side to side, never up or down or to either sides.

Later on You actually see the camera capturing (following) the chopper "legs", not moving exactly with it as You would expect if it was mounted.

That's some smooth camera operating job.  less

Believe your own eyes
By this point in time, most people who've bothered to really look into the 9/11 story realize:

1. There is something seriously amiss and still unexplained about the late afternoon   more...collapse of World Trade Center Seven on 9/11.

2. The "crash of United 93" in Pennsylvania left an awfully small hole on the ground and no visible wreckage - or bodies!

3. The wreckage at the Pentagon is in no way consistent with the crash of a large jet passenger plane. Not only that but also on the day of impact, all the local security camera video was seized and has been kept from public view ever since.

Now, get ready for a real shocker, one that will require you to really stretch your mind on the subjects of perception, propaganda and evil.

Here it is:

The evidence is overwhelming that no jetliners hit the Twin Towers.

No plane in Pennsylvania. No plane at the Pentagon. And no planes in New York either.

I know this sounds crazy, but stick with it for a moment.

How do we know there were no planes in New York?

We know because the supposedly "live" footage of planes hitting the World Trade Center turns out upon careful examination to have been manipulated in very obvious ways.

If the scope of this deception seems beyond comprehension, the logistics needed to pull it off were really quite simple.

Here's what you need to know to understand how this deception was accomplished.

1. The "news" flows from a small handful of major networks. If they say it, it's true. If they show video that shows it happened, it happened. Period.

2. Each of the major news networks has a single person who completely controls what it shown on their air. He's called the news director.

3. The news director calls all the shots in a TV newsroom.

He controls what footage will be shown, what scripts will be read by the news anchor, and when a live feed will be shown - and when it will be cut off.

4. To completely control the reporting of any major event, all you need to do is control a small handful of news directors.

If the news director doesn't like the way an anchorperson is ad libbing, he can tell him or her through their earpiece to change the subject.

If the news director doesn't like what a real eyewitness is saying in a live feed, he can order the scene to be cut away to something else.

If the news director wants a certain piece of footage shown, all he has to do is hand it to one of the tech people and it will be shown, no questions asked, no debate, no analysis.

5. In order to pull off this massive fraud, the conspirators needed only three things:

FIRST: The ability to quickly alter video footage, specifically add the moving image of a plane to existing footage.

This is so easy to do it's laughable.

SECOND: A news director to receive the doctored tape, hand it to a video tech, and say "play this when you get the cue."

THIRD: A FEW rehearsed eye witnesses in place ready to jump in front of the news cameras on the scene and say they "witnessed" something that never happened.

This last part is EASY, especially when you realize that it's the news director who tells the reporter on the scene who to interview and who to ignore.

The news director does this remotely from the control room back at the studio. He can see what the on-the-scene camera is shooting and directs the on-the-scene reporter long before anything ever hits the air.

A cast of thousands, hundreds or even dozens was not needed to to pull off this media deception.

All that was needed were the news directors at the top networks to do what they were told, a few actors at the scene to play at being eye witnesses, and a dime-a-dozen video editor to re-work the "live" footage so that it shows "reality" the way the conspirators wanted it to be shown.

With a system like this in place, you can have hundreds of millions of people saying they "saw" something that never actually happened,  less

911 Was A Media Hoax - bsregistration

911 Was A Media Job

policja policja

Pentagon TV Fakery

911TVF MIND RAPE WQ2RX TERROR WHORE

911taboo

911taboo

911 AUGMENTED

911 Missile Attack

this show is an action show,
there is no DVD on this show,
no personal sites or eps for dawnload,so tell me what yuo think.

A video questioning the Australian government's official conclusions with regard to Martin Bryant's involvement in the shooting massacre at the Port Arthur Historic Site in Tasmania on 26 April 1996 and   more...related events. The video was produced "in the public interest by survivors of the Port Arthur massacre and sympathetic investigators".  less

Weapons of Mass Distraction

Parkour Walltricks

TV Fakery IS Fake - Explanations

TV Fakery in Slow Motion

TV Fakery 911 Time Cheats and Contradictions unfinished

Troy from West Virginia Comes Out for a Hook-Up

Trippin' 911

CFR Council On Foreign Relations - How They CONTROL THE MEDIA

911 WNYW - Diretta TV

911 Witness: "It's a Bomb"

911 TVF No Planers are So Paranoid and Twitchy