emf effects on the mind

emf effects on the brain

The Power Of Thought's

cell phone antenna mind control waves

modern mind control

My thoughts on er ah well my thoughts. My thanks to Dan of KY. And my excitement about the future. Music by: Kevin MacLeod

http://www.mindwatch.com.au/FREE-UltimateMindTools.html Ultimate Mind Tools ! Get it now! FREE workshop with Marcus Freudenmann. This e-course will teach you emotional intelligence and will transform   more...your life with MindWatch.  less

Mind Control America's Secret War

Stop being self-dishonest. We are one and equal. Stop being mind.
Dont think you are - know you are. The mind is deception.
I do not accept anything less than who I am.
I do not accept anything less than   more...who you are.
  less

Think about everything that had to go right for you to exist!! It's amazing!!

Burger King vs. McDonalds to the death !!!

I am talking to myself here as much as to anyone. I am seeking to be propelled out of stupidity and lack of ability. Just shaking things up a bit. Following the green line.

ADHD

.Today, many American college campuses are dominated by the ideology of political correctness. According to the tenets of political correctness, the United States is the source of all the world’s troubles,   more...capitalism is evil, and people’s biological heritage makes them either “oppressors” or “victims”. Political correctness does not tolerate dissent, so students who disagree with the ideology are often punished. Tools like speech codes are used by school administrators to enforce thought conformity. At Cal Poly, one student endured a Kafkaesque disciplinary ordeal that lasted more than a year and ended up in federal court—just for posting a flyer announcing an upcoming event! Welcome to the world of higher education today, where universities seem more intent on teaching students what to think than how to think  less

Yeah,theres blood every where!!

These are deliberate attacks on US soldiers videotaped by Iraqi Terrorists. This is why we should annilehate these people and their dirty sticking country and culture. Americans need to STOP being so   more...apathetic towards the enemy. Perhaps if it want your son killed by these dirty muslims and their stupid beliefs in a dirty mohammed. KILL THEM ALL.  less

Mind Control Americas Secret War

<a href="http://www.emfnews.org/chipcategory.html">EMF Protection Products</a>
<a href="http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html">Airtube Headsets</a>
<a href="http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html">Cell   more...Tower Protection</a>
<a href="http://www.emfnews.org/cell-phone-radiation-book.html">Educational
Cell Phone Ebook</a>
In December, 2006, an epidemiological study on cell phone dangers published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute sent the media into a frenzy.10 Newspaper headlines blared: Danish Study Shows Cell Phone Use is Safe, while TV newscasters proclaimed, Go ahead and talk all you wantits safe! The news seemed to be a holiday gift for cell phone users. But unfortunately, its a flawed study, funded by the cell phone industry and designed to bring a positive result. The industrys public relations machine is working in overdrive to assure that the study get top-billing in the media worldwide.
According to Dr. George Carlo, the study, by its design, could not identify even a very large risk. Therefore, any claim that it proves theres no risk from cell phones is a blatant misrepresentation of the data that will give consumers a very dangerous false sense of security.
Epidemiological studies are targets for fixing the outcome because theyre observational in nature instead of experimental, Dr. Carlo explains. Its possible to design studies with pre-determined outcomesthat still fall within the range of acceptable science. Thus, even highly flawed epidemiological studies can be published in peer-reviewed journals because theyre judged against a pragmatic set of standards that assume the highest integrity among the investigators.
Key problems with the study are:
1. There are few discernable differences between who was defined as cell phone users and who wasnt. Thus, people defined as exposed to radiation were pretty much the same as those defined as not exposed to radiation. With few differences, its nearly impossible to find a risk.
2. Users were defined as anyone who made at least one phone call per week for six months between 1982 and 1995. So any person who made 26 calls was a cell phone user and therefore considered exposed to radiation. Those with less than 26 calls were non-users. In reality, the radiation exposure between users and non-users defined in this manner is not discernable.
3. The exposed people used ancient cell phone technology bearing little resemblance to cell phones used today. The results, even if reliable, have no relevance to the 2 billion cell phone users today.
4. From 1982 to 1995, cell phone minutes cost much more than today and people used their phones much less. Thus there was very little radiation exposure.
5. During the studys time frame, people likely to use their cell phones the most were commercial subscribers. Yet this highest exposed group, in whom risk would most easily be identified, was specifically excluded from the study.
6. There were no biological hypotheses tested in the study. It was therefore only a numbers game. Ignored were mechanisms of disease found in other studies of cell phone radiation effects, including genetic damage, blood-brain barrier leakage, and disrupted intercellular communication. The study did not discuss any research supporting the notion that cell phones could cause problems in users.
7. The study itself was inconsistent with cancer statistics published worldwide addressing the Danish population. This study showed a low risk of cancer overall, when in fact Denmark has some of the highest cancer rates in the world. This inconsistency suggested that something in the data does not add up.
The cell phone industry constantly guards its financial interests, but unfortunately, an unwitting public can be harmed in the process, says Dr. Carlo. Industry-funded studies in many cases now produce industry-desired outcomes. By tampering with the integrity of scientists, scientific systems and public information steps over the lines of propriety that   less

Yeah, you may have already seen it, if you haven't don't fear it, confront it. Oh and thanks to biblesaves or something on YT for this particular vid (I'd send a message but can't for the most obvious   more...reason as being stated in my nick!), and I'd like to raise some points about some things I think are becoming more apparent every day with more people becoming aware of these events in their own personal context.

Here are a few thoughts I have had this evening after seeing a lot of these videos cropping up over the last few years, plus some personal experiences.

If you don't care, good luck and click 'x'.

Sure there are hoaxes but many can't be discounted as such because it's simply how cameras are picking up different frequencies our own machine bodies can't in certain limited vibrational states of the mind. The vibratory levels of the earth are changing, and a few even see these sort of things day to day being in tune with these other frequencies of reality, for they do not rely as much with their physical eyes anymore.

Tsarion said something along the lines of get to be comfortable with the seemingly dead things about you, and the miracles of the simplest things, giving gratitude. Your world as real as you think it is, is shared with other dimensions; it's as simple as that, as the evidence can't be denied. And anyone who tried to debunk or whatever just doesn't want you feeling happier than them, being trained in being an animal usually and just wanting you dumbed down as they chose to be, so let them whinge as much as they like. Let them have their world of matter and enforced servitude under their own accepted limits. Their vibrational level wont ascend to anything but to back on the wheel of rebirth again...until they finally get it. Hmm actually I could be wrong there in a big way with the 2012 thing... but whatever; I am sure this is what has been happening over the eons. Just observe for yourself, let the debunkers end up debunking themselves. Don't let them steal your time, or lifetime of experience in some cases I am sure.

Mainly I posted this to show that if the woman in the second part isn't a hoax then there is an example of sharing body space with other beings of other realities; some malign and some guardian like. Get to know these presences and be comfortable with them, but do not engage in satanic ritual to communicate with them as you are dealing with something you can't see and untrained in the current cultural paradigm to deal with and if it's intention is malign you may have some serious trouble. Just ask those who wake up with scratches on their body in the morning and other odd and awful occurences such as the irrepressible anger they have. This is why, I feel, that a lot of appearances of these entities occur at sites of foul play etc or suicide, as the mind can't accept it has moved into another dimension or is stuck betwixt dimensions for other beings to learn from in experiencing, or / and maybe waiting to return to it's body...or reform into the physical plane, maybe being unaware of time as the physical body is subjected to. There are cases of human looking organs and parts growing within human bodies. I mean in a parasitic way... as in bodies in bodies...Some beings try to intend their form within one, so desperate to reclaim a body. Medicine is quick to wack a label to it and not talk about it, but it really happens. I could relate stories and accounts for some time, many of my own personal experience, but what's the point? People just wack a label to something and maybe look under those key terms and then they are in all sorts of a mess. Just simply observe for yourself. (cont'd in comments)  less

First of all, this video is from a show that doesn't seem to be on tv anymore. I remember a particular show about a year ago or so where the presenter, who from memory seemed to be a bit of a comedian,   more...went to a church to be exorcised. It was quite fascinating and wasn't funny watching him reel around on tv at a certain point. His show sort of stopped after that..Well I haven't seen him again anyway..

In this particular show I happened to find he has David Oates on to show his technique of reverse speech.

'Reverse Speech' uses audio analysis techniques to discern other forms of audio and 'thought' or as the creator says ' Subconscious footnotes' hidden within the voice from normal audible patterns via reversal.

I saw this page that got me very interested... :
http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=15422834&blogID=287650924

..about a month ago late one night and watched the whole thing. Around different forums people seem undecided. I am not certain yet myself but if this is an honestly applicable technique it means many amazing things-

You can analyse any method of audible? communication that you feel is important ... this is very interesting...

David Oates, who made this process available has suffered a lot of criticism yet he has 16 years experience and a lot of proof plus many solid examples.

Here's his site:
http://www.reversespeech.com/fulford.htm
A more positive Video of it's use:
Reverse Speech and the Soul
http://youtube.com/watch?v=4V-NjhEYNJU

Some figure heads you apparently serve:

What does the Queen really think about Princess Di ?:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=IN4QLpODQ1Q
A member at YouTube commented 'what if the speech was prepared?'
Mr Oates Responded :
"Yes but she is speaking it - reversals aren't created by the words but by the sounds of speech - 2 people? can say the same sentence and different reversals will occur because it is the individual's vocal patterns that create the reversals"

What George Bush really thinks of The Queen?
Reverse Speech analysis of President Bush welcoming the Queen to the US in May 2007:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=N0_mEkqUVGQ

"I cuss at them" "We are Bonded"...

Reverse Speech analysis of George Bush - august 22, 2007
http://youtube.com/watch?v=QiLgak3Y76w

Reverse Speech - Bush admits 9/11 is "in a larger deal".
http://youtube.com/watch?v=2GE4yeW8tLE

Reverse Speech of the News July 2007
http://youtube.com/watch?v=cXTkIPaW9EM

Hidden message in Rumsfeld's testimony at Tillman Hearing
http://youtube.com/watch?v=9y9EHuev8qk

Let's not forget Hillary..:
Reverse Speech on Hillary Clinton
"Listen to the meaning behind the words of Hillary Clinton as she declares her intentions to run for the Presidency"
http://youtube.com/watch?v=jAiF0p5hA1I

Bill should be lurking there somewhere too.

Examples of Reverse Speech on famous people
http://youtube.com/watch?v=9NUhkWFsatU

A more comprehensive video about how it works:
"...fascinating video that explores some of the synchronicities that occur in Reverse Speech" :
http://youtube.com/watch?v=2R9MCQnCxis

Here are some of his explanations :
"If human speech is recorded and played backwards, mixed amongst the gibberish at regular intervals can be heard very clear statements. These statements usually appear in short sentence form and are nearly always related to the forward speech.
It appears constantly throughout language, so much so in fact, that it is believed to be a natural part of our speech processes."

"...yeah - thats a fair comment - whilst rs does reveal the truth, it
doesnt reveal the total truth - it's more like footnotes from the unconscious"

"...(In a response to the Queen reading a speech)...Yes but she is
speaking it - reversals aren't created by the words but by the sounds of speech - 2 people? can say the same sentence and different reversals will occur because it is the individual's vocal patterns that create th  less

Planning To Lose The War

A few of my perspectives,just wondering,about certain things.

iraqi gets what he deserves

Teaser trailer for new Nigmatic CD "Thought Crimes". Coming in May 2007.