A brief history of how big corporations have being fighting for their right to be corrupt

A brief history of how big corporations have being fighting for their right to be corrupt.

director Robert Greenwald (Wal-Mart: The High Cost of Low Price, Outfoxed, and Uncovered) takes you inside the lives of soldiers, truck drivers, widows and children who have been changed forever as a   more...result of profiteering in the reconstruction of Iraq. Iraq for Sale uncovers the connections between private corporations making a killing in Iraq and the decision makers who allow them to do so  less

big corporations and the complaining public

Do you want to make a difference?

You can.

Go to this website, print out the list and make some changes folks.

http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune500/2008/full_list/

DO NOT BUY FROM THESE CORPORATIONS.

Big oil, giant corporations and big government thank you for bending over.

<b>in this first video we look at what people saw that day .These are all eyewitness accounts of what was seen on 9/11

Did you realize we're still in war?

So are you awake

<b>Hicks tended to balance heady discussion of religion, politics and personal issues , Here bill is at his best and always topics that make people stop and think *Rest in Piece Bill

<b>A day we will never forget and something we will always ask Open Mind

The family's are looking for answers, and the people are waking up

<b>More truth reveled as we look at a conversation with Aaron Russo and Nick Rockerfella, and a look at the Real ID Act and RFID.

response to a vid well done...bravo!

Predictive Programming....there are no nations its just corporations http://www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com

IMPORTANT JUST LISTEN

WHAT TO DO WITH YOUR GOVERNMENT REBATE CHECK

http://www.WhatYouWantFast.com/Grants FREE CD to show you how to find and obtain free government grants, government grants for business, government grants for women, and government business grants

Just some of my views

Spitzergate

Clip from How to Get Ahead in Advertising (1989)

Speaking freely here and not worrying too much about being right. Stirring the pot and mixing the issues.

Jack Cafferty asks: If the government lies to us about the size of the deficit, what else do they lie to us about?

Anti-communist PROPAGANDA; ostensibly patriotic film which shows us the capitalist good guys and the socialists who wish to enslave us all. [This is one of a series of films produced by the Extension   more...Department of Harding College to create a deeper understanding of what has made America the finest place in the world to live.] Harding College presents Make Mine Freedom, color by Technicolor. A John Sutherland film

The end of World War II did not bring peace at home. Nuclear anxiety, anti-Communism and international political realignments fueled the Cold War and turned our country's media landscape into a battleground. In the press, on the radio, and increasingly through the newly emerging medium of television, business and labor struggled for power over the national consciousness. Seeking a prize worth much more than public consent, these opposing forces fought to redefine the economic structure of the nation.
To most working people, postwar "normalcy" meant a final farewell to Depression-induced privation, access to consumer goods unavailable during the war years, and a redistribution of the economic pie through the newly powerful labor movement. To business, however, the end of hostilities promised freedom from New Deal liberalism. Corporations sought an end to planning and government influence, to communist, socialist and labor movements, and above all, shrinkage of the public sector, swollen in sixteen years of economic depression and war. Both sides characterized their points of view as patriotic and their opponents as un-American.
Business fought for influence through organizations like the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the National Association of Manufacturers. Their intentions were presented as lofty and neutral: to educate Americans about our economic system and its benefits. Launching a giant propaganda offensive, these organizations pumped out press releases, published books, organized public and private meetings, bought advertising (for examples, see "The Pursuit of Profit" and "Freedom of Choice") and produced motion pictures.
One institution most anxious to spread the news about capitalism was the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, founded by the former chairman of General Motors. The Sloan Foundation funded a small institution (the pro-free enterprise, staunchly anti-Communist Harding College in Searcy, Arkansas, which hired John Sutherland Productions, Inc. as producer) to produce a series of nine "short cartoon films, in color, which would portray simple economic truths about the American system of production and distribution in an interesting and entertaining manner." A series of grants totaling $597,870 was made to Harding College, $150,000 of this contributed by the Maurice and Laura Falk Foundation of Pittsburgh. The films were intended both for showing in theaters, schools, at community group meetings and in workplaces, often at lunchtime screenings in factories. Ironically, this effort was made feasible by a Federal government initiative: the distribution of war surplus 16mm projectors to educational and nonprofit organizations.
There was nothing new about the idea of reaching working people on the job. As an idea, "luncheon movies" date back to the 'teens, when John Patterson of National Cash Register in Dayton, Ohio pursued what were then advanced media forms to reach NCR employees with messages of inspiration, training and control. During the Depression, companies undergoing union organizing campaigns took every opportunity to reach their workers with anti-union messages, morning, noon and night. As Business Screen (Vol. 10, No. 1, 1949) said, "During the war, 62% of large U.S. employers made use of incentive or employee attitude motion pictures. Today, that figure has dropped to 35%. Isn't it reasonable to believe that a mass return to employee film programs would help pave the way for smoother labor-management relations? And at 50c a year per employee, or even two or three dollars, wouldn't it be   less