We been had!

This video is where you must be mentally in order to understand what the group "iOpeners" is all about. It shows the truths behind the lies about the recent events in our history that has mesmerized   more...and taken control of the minds of the population at large, turning you into a complacent scared people that is willing to be entertained over being informed. There is an awakening already in progress and if you aren't part of the solution please move out of the way.  less

This is the long version of this project. It is an attempt to look at the violations of the first amendment, and show that the government has no respect for your rights
Police footage from Eye of the Storm.

<B>Read Description for a link to part 2</b>
David Icke speaks to the constituents of Haltemprice and Howden about the 'Big Brother' election, forced by the resignation of David Davis, and   more...the move towards the global Big Brother enslavement we are all facing. (Official Full Version)
<a href="http://www.livevideo.com/video/ConspiracyCentral/0B0721111610409A89AE5FC3BCECA4D0/david-icke-big-brother-big-g.aspx">Click Here for part 2</a>  less

<b>Read Description for a link to part 3</b>
David Icke speaks to the constituents of Haltemprice and Howden about the 'Big Brother' election, forced by the resignation of David Davis, and   more...the move towards the global Big Brother enslavement we are all facing. (Official Full Version)
<a href="http://www.livevideo.com/video/ConspiracyCentral/DFE20A05685F4F469943994446B11DD4/david-icke-big-brother-big-g.aspx">Click here for part 3</a>  less

Jack Cafferty asks: If the government lies to us about the size of the deficit, what else do they lie to us about?

www.aclj.org
109624 people who have already signed using the Internet!
By greatly expanding the scope of lobbying regulation, the grassroots lobbying bills (H.R. 4682 and S.1) would affect many churches,   more...pastors, denominations, public interest organizations, law firms, radio and TV personalities, civic organizations, nonprofit and for-profit organizations, the media, and private individuals that voluntarily choose to pay for any medium to distribute their message to the general public.
This is a posting for: BillyBobJoe57
to view more of the many political videos from BillyBobJoe57 go to:
www.youtube.com/profile?user=billybobjoe57  less

These craft need to be brought out in the open. This science and subect need FULL public disclosure, at any cost, because this planet and race depend on it at this juncture in time.
We're on the edge of   more...rebirth or total collapse. I would prefer a new way of doing things.
How about you?

The conditions described in the video have been experienced numerous times by myself, and occassionally by others present with me. The most dramatic events have occurred after a light meal and with a relaxed mind. I've noticed that after meditation, the probability of finding an orb increases by 10 times or more. I don't know why that is, but i suspect it's simply a relaxed mind that perceives these things the easiest.
A lot of the time the orbs can't be seen through the viewfinder on the camera, but fine with the naked eye. Yet, a lot of the time the orbs aren't even detected until reviewing the tape later on.
But of course the most dramatic and close up events happen while you can see, smell, and feel them...It's like being covered in static electricity, and smelling a lightning storm. Totally electrical.

Here's some links that are crucial to understanding orbs a little better. We need to understand the "enemy" in order to catch them.
Hopefully one day, physically catch one of these. :)

And go public with it. Globally.

http://www.americanantigravity.com/

http://www.pbs.org/tesla/

http://www.teslasociety.com/biography.htm


These Videos MUST Be Seen

Evidence-The Case For NASA UFOs Part 1
http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-3158536181786836548&q=Evidence%2C+The+Case+For+NASA+UFOs&total=43&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=1

Evidence-The Case For NASA UFOs Part 2
http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=8524267568796529301&q=Evidence%2C+The+Case+For+NASA+UFOs&total=43&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0

The Disclosure Project
http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-1166743665260900218&q=Disclosure+Project&total=389&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0

Operation Paperclip Info
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Fascism/Operation_Paperclip_file.html  less

<B>Read Description for a link to part 4</b>
David Icke speaks to the constituents of Haltemprice and Howden about the 'Big Brother' election, forced by the resignation of David Davis, and   more...the move towards the global Big Brother enslavement we are all facing. (Official Full Version)
<A href="http://www.livevideo.com/video/ConspiracyCentral/DB26DCE726654AF6B428402B026CAC0B/david-icke-big-brother-big-g.aspx">Click Here for part 4</a>  less

<strong>Link to part 2/2 below</strong>
Robert-Arthur:Menard gives a seminar on The Illusion of the Person, what Words in Law mean, Consent, Acceptance, Honor & Dishonour, Bills of Exchange,   more...and more! Highly relevant information about just how The Powers That Be govern over us, and what we can do about it.

<a href="http://www.thinkfree.ca">http://www.thinkfree.ca</a>

<a href="http://www.livevideo.com/video/Drachnid/EBDFD827754642799E9ABF9B0FC01832/think-free-bursting-bubbles-.aspx"><strong>Click here to view part 2/2</strong></a>

  less

an attempt to dispel regret

<B>Read Description for a link to part 5</b>
David Icke speaks to the constituents of Haltemprice and Howden about the 'Big Brother' election, forced by the resignation of David Davis, and   more...the move towards the global Big Brother enslavement we are all facing. (Official Full Version)
<A href="http://www.livevideo.com/video/ConspiracyCentral/BB7A326FC415463382A17507BAB64794/david-icke-big-brother-big-g.aspx">Click Here for part 5</a>  less

Bill Moyers speaks to The National Conference on Media Reform about the importance of a free press.

<b>Read Description for a link to part 2</b>
The final programme focussed on the concepts of positive and negative liberty introduced in the 1950s by Isaiah Berlin. Curtis briefly explained   more...how negative liberty could be defined as freedom from coercion and positive liberty as the opportunity to strive to fulfill one's potential. Tony Blair had read Berlin's essays on the topic and wrote to him[4] in the late 1990s, arguing that positive and negative liberty could be mutually compatible. He never received a reply, as Berlin was on his death bed.
<a href="http://www.livevideo.com/video/ConspiracyCentral/9D2FE9C1EDFC46E28368840028B33BD5/the-trap-we-will-force-you-t.aspx">Click Here for part 2</a>
The programme began with a description of the Two Concepts of Liberty, reviewing Berlin's opinion that, since it lacked coercion, negative liberty was the 'safer' of the two. Curtis then explained how many political groups who sought their vision of freedom ended up using violence to achieve it.

For example the French revolutionaries wished to overthrow a monarchical system which they viewed as antithetical to freedom, but in so doing ended up with the so-called Reign of Terror. Similarly, the Communist revolutionaries in Russia, who sought to overthrow the old order and replace it with a society in which everyone was equal, ended up creating a totalitarian regime which used violence to achieve its ends.

Using violence, not simply as a means to achieve one's goals, but also as an expression of freedom from Western bourgeois norms, was an idea developed by African revolutionary Frantz Fanon. He developed it from the Existentialist ideology of Jean-Paul Sartre, who argued that terrorism was a "terrible weapon but the oppressed poor have no others." [5]. These views were expressed, for example, in the revolutionary film The Battle of Algiers.

This programme also explored how economic freedom had been used in Russia and the problems this had introduced. A set of policies known as "shock therapy" were brought in mainly by outsiders, which had the effect of destroying the social safety net that existed in most other western nations and Russia. In the latter, the sudden removal of e.g. the subsidies for basic goods caused their prices to rise enormously, making them hardly affordable for ordinary people. An economic crisis escalated during the 1990s and some people were paid in goods rather than money. Yeltsin was accused by his parliamentary deputies of "economic genocide", due to the large numbers of people now too poor to eat. Yeltsin responded to this by removing parliament's power and becoming increasingly autocratic. At the same time, many formerly state-owned industries were sold to private businesses, often at a fraction of their real value. Ordinary people, often in financial difficulties, would sell shares, which to them were worthless, for cash, without appreciating their true value. This ended up with the rise of the Oligarchs—super-rich businessmen who attributed their rise to the sell offs of the '90s. It resulted in a polarisation of society into the poor and ultra-rich, and indirectly led to a more autocratic style of government under Vladimir Putin, which, while less free, promised to provide people with dignity and basic living requirements.

There was a similar review of post-war Iraq, in which an even more extreme "shock therapy" was employed—the removal from government of all Ba'ath party employees and the introduction of economic models which followed the simplified economic model of human beings outlined in the first two programmes—this had the result of immediately disintegrating Iraqi society and the rise of two strongly autocratic insurgencies, one based on Sunni-Ba'athist ideals and another based on revolutionary Shi'a philosophies.

Curtis also looked at the neo-conservative agenda of the 1980s. Like Sartre, they argued that violence would sometimes be necessary to achieve their goals, except they wis  less

HUGH GRANT...taken from the motion picture MUSIC AND LYRICS

Just a recap for the people who are still confused on what the New World Order is and what the connection is to our money.

Modeling Wanna Be...Photo Shoot!..hehehe!

WHAT TO DO WITH YOUR GOVERNMENT REBATE CHECK

<B>Read Description for a link to part 1</b>
David Icke speaks to the constituents of Haltemprice and Howden about the 'Big Brother' election, forced by the resignation of David Davis, and   more...the move towards the global Big Brother enslavement we are all facing. (Official Full Version)
<A href="http://www.livevideo.com/video/ConspiracyCentral/5FD123973AA54B2B861106C4612CCD18/david-icke-big-brother-big-g.aspx">Click Here for part 1</a>  less

I try to give a fresh look to the issue of a smaller federal government.

AMY GRANT

Time to Wake Up People

Security?

Prosperity?

Security from indictment for Bush.

Prosperity for GHWB and the folks he fronts for. Starting with Carlyle Group
The Carlyle Group is a global private equity investment   more...firm, based in Washington, D.C., with more than $81.1 billion of equity capital under management.[1] The firm operates four fund families, focusing on leveraged buyouts, venture & growth capital, real estate and leveraged finance investments. The firm employs more than 575 investment professionals in 21 countries with several offices in North America, South America, Europe, Asia and Australia; its portfolio companies employ more than 286,000 people worldwide. Carlyle has over 1200 investors in 68 countries.

The firm has employed political figures and notable investors. Some of these figures, such as former US President George H. W. Bush and former US Secretary of State James A. Baker III, have generated controversy stemming from allegations of conflicts of interest.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carlyle_Group  less

Urban farmer Will Allen was named a MacArthur Fellow in 2008. The Fellowship is a $500,000, no-strings-attached grant for individuals who have shown exceptional creativity in their work and the promise   more...to do more.  less

<b>Read Description for a link to part 3</b>
The final programme focussed on the concepts of positive and negative liberty introduced in the 1950s by Isaiah Berlin. Curtis briefly explained   more...how negative liberty could be defined as freedom from coercion and positive liberty as the opportunity to strive to fulfill one's potential. Tony Blair had read Berlin's essays on the topic and wrote to him[4] in the late 1990s, arguing that positive and negative liberty could be mutually compatible. He never received a reply, as Berlin was on his death bed.
<a href="http://www.livevideo.com/video/ConspiracyCentral/3D595A38B2F042F783FFC38A2F9886CE/the-trap-we-will-force-you-t.aspx">Click Here for part 3</a>

The programme began with a description of the Two Concepts of Liberty, reviewing Berlin's opinion that, since it lacked coercion, negative liberty was the 'safer' of the two. Curtis then explained how many political groups who sought their vision of freedom ended up using violence to achieve it.

For example the French revolutionaries wished to overthrow a monarchical system which they viewed as antithetical to freedom, but in so doing ended up with the so-called Reign of Terror. Similarly, the Communist revolutionaries in Russia, who sought to overthrow the old order and replace it with a society in which everyone was equal, ended up creating a totalitarian regime which used violence to achieve its ends.

Using violence, not simply as a means to achieve one's goals, but also as an expression of freedom from Western bourgeois norms, was an idea developed by African revolutionary Frantz Fanon. He developed it from the Existentialist ideology of Jean-Paul Sartre, who argued that terrorism was a "terrible weapon but the oppressed poor have no others." [5]. These views were expressed, for example, in the revolutionary film The Battle of Algiers.

This programme also explored how economic freedom had been used in Russia and the problems this had introduced. A set of policies known as "shock therapy" were brought in mainly by outsiders, which had the effect of destroying the social safety net that existed in most other western nations and Russia. In the latter, the sudden removal of e.g. the subsidies for basic goods caused their prices to rise enormously, making them hardly affordable for ordinary people. An economic crisis escalated during the 1990s and some people were paid in goods rather than money. Yeltsin was accused by his parliamentary deputies of "economic genocide", due to the large numbers of people now too poor to eat. Yeltsin responded to this by removing parliament's power and becoming increasingly autocratic. At the same time, many formerly state-owned industries were sold to private businesses, often at a fraction of their real value. Ordinary people, often in financial difficulties, would sell shares, which to them were worthless, for cash, without appreciating their true value. This ended up with the rise of the Oligarchs—super-rich businessmen who attributed their rise to the sell offs of the '90s. It resulted in a polarisation of society into the poor and ultra-rich, and indirectly led to a more autocratic style of government under Vladimir Putin, which, while less free, promised to provide people with dignity and basic living requirements.

There was a similar review of post-war Iraq, in which an even more extreme "shock therapy" was employed—the removal from government of all Ba'ath party employees and the introduction of economic models which followed the simplified economic model of human beings outlined in the first two programmes—this had the result of immediately disintegrating Iraqi society and the rise of two strongly autocratic insurgencies, one based on Sunni-Ba'athist ideals and another based on revolutionary Shi'a philosophies.

Curtis also looked at the neo-conservative agenda of the 1980s. Like Sartre, they argued that violence would sometimes be necessary to achieve their goals, except they w  less