Mary takes Bikini News on the street while Jen talks to you about next year's lack of candidates. Can you spot the text error in the episode?

After taking a shot at the Democrats and introducing the latest in papal headgear, the Bikini News babes finally take it off!

Jen's in a tizzy about the liberals trying to ruin the US Mint and Mary's just happy to be here.

An MC Jew C/Lil' Mitzvah Election Exclusive!

Please check out my new website:

www.septemberclues.info

On 9/11, the US TV networks used computer generated sceneries of Manhattan. Multiple layering techniques and softwares were employed to simulate   more..."airplanes crashing into the World Trade Center". We now have conclusive evidence that the TV networks aired manipulated images live on 9/11. The subsequent so-called "amateur" videos were more sophisticated video composites yet all have now been exposed for what they are : total forgeries.  less

Hey it's Leah and I'm just trying to figure out where in the heck this NON-sex tape could be. If Cara doesn't have it, where is it?
xo
Love

Bill Clinton is just that awesome

Bikini News has been acquired by Fox. Here's a trailer for the new episode.

Please check out my new website:

www.septemberclues.info

The myriad of theories surrounding 9/11 have served the perpetrators well for over 7 years, giving the false impression freedom of speech was alive   more...and well but ultimately spreading an almost mindnumbing confusion.
Most "911truth" organizations are run by the same people who organised this sham. This in order to 'control' the opposition, for as long as possible, in the hope it would all fade away one day in the public consciousness.
As most theories have built on the false assumption that airplanes were involved, the 'plane' myth has held strong - in spite of the widespread understanding no airliner crashed at the Pentagon or in Shanksville.
The misheld belief that 'thousands of Newyorkers' saw passenger planes crash into the twin towers is upheld solely by the relentless pounding of the mainstream media, the higher levels of which have complied to the requirements of this military false-flag operation.
Virtually all firsthand witnesses to the first "plane" were newspeople as shown in SEPTEMBER CLUESpart D. As for the second "plane", MOST witnesses on the street reported 'a SMALL PLANE' or even 'A MISSILE' . These reports were actually aired on the day but never again. Of course, a plane-shaped cruise missile with wings and tail section (such as a JASSM cruise missile) would be perceived as a 'small plane' to most people :in fact, a study of 12000 pages of testimonies has determined the majority of eyewitnesses reported a small aircraft - NOT a large airliner.
In SEPTEMBER CLUES part F we see that the alleged authors of the "amateur" videos ALSO were people linked to the newsmedia / film and video industry. All of those clips are, by now, proven forgeries : Many turn out to be simply cropped duplicates of the same composite, while most disqualify each other by the way of unconcilable differences : trajectories, angles, pitch, yaw, speeds, lighting, hues - you name it. The few clips showing the actual 'plane' penetration depict a wide body (aluminum) airliner penetrating the steel-frame tower effortlessly without even the brittle tail section breaking off. This is of course utterly absurd and makes a joke of the laws of physics.
The current reluctance of most people to recognize and accept this research is - in many ways - understandable, the foremost cause being the massive conditioning power of the mainstream newsmedia.
However, the many mistakes made by the authors of these crude fabrications (which included digital simulations of the Manhattan landscape) will not stand the test of time. This branch of 9/11 truth research is naturally being vigorously attacked and billed as "disinformation" - as it contains the only tangible and repeatable proof of this murderous hoax : with no rubble to analyze and only speculation to go on, no one is going to prove HOW 3 towers collapsed nor IF or WHY a Norad standdown was ordered. On the other hand, the evidence of TV fakery cannot be suppressed no matter how hard the perpetrators may try.
There is no such thing as 'the perfect crime'.  less

People keep asking me, Why did I ask this question? Why hasn't there been a woman president yet? There have been and are Women Presidents many places on the planet. Why not here too? What do you think?   more...I really wanted to know what women and men think! I went to the Seattle Comedy Underground and asked a bunch of Comedians before open mic on Sunday, Jan. 21, 2007., before the show. This is what I got.
Enjoy!
Travis Simmons - funny4food
Comedian & Human Being  less

STEP UP 2 THE ELECTION!

Who's sexier Bill or Barack? Don't you all wanna know the answer?

NEW SEPTEMBER CLUES website:
www.septemberclues.info

It is now a proven fact that we were shown doctored images on TV on 9/11.
The SEPTEMBER CLUES video series (part1-9+EPILOGUE) is a 100min analysis   more...of all the inconsistencies of the broadcasts aired on that sad, fateful day.
"NOSED OUT" is a trailer of sorts to SEPTEMBER CLUES. It demonstrates beyond any reasonable doubt that the FOX live shot showing "Flight175" hitting WTC2 is a computer generated forgery.
The myriad of theories surrounding 9/11 have served the perpetrators well for almost 7 years, giving the false impression freedom of speech was alive and well but ultimately spreading an almost mindnumbing confusion.
Most "911truth" organizations are run by the same people who organised this sham. This in order to 'control' the opposition, for as long as possible, in the hope it would all fade away one day in the public consciousness.
As most theories have built on the false assumption that airplanes were involved, the 'plane' myth has held strong - in spite of the widespread understanding no airliner crashed at the Pentagon or in Shanksville.
The misheld belief that 'thousands of Newyorkers' saw passenger planes crash into the twin towers is upheld solely by the relentless pounding of the mainstream media,
the higher levels of which have complied to the requirements of this military false-flag operation.
Virtually all firsthand witnesses to the first "plane" were newspeople as shown in SEPTEMBER CLUES part4. As for the second "plane", most witnesses on the street
reported 'a SMALL AIRCRAFT' or even 'A MISSILE' . These reports were actually aired on the day but never again.
Only about 36 videos exist depicting an airplane silhouette impacting the towers. All of them are, by now, proven fakes. Many turn out to be simply cropped duplicates of the same composite, while most disqualify each other by the way of unconcilable differences : trajectories, angles, pitch, yaw, speeds, lighting, hues - you name it. The few clips showing the actual 'plane' penetration depict a wide body aluminum airliner penetrating the steel-frame tower effortlessly without as much as a rear aileron breaking off. This is of course utterly absurd and makes a joke of the laws of physics.
The current reluctance of most people to recognize and accept this research is - in many ways - understandable, the foremost cause being the massive conditioning power of the mainstream newsmedia.
However, the many mistakes made by the authors of this total video forgery (which included digital simulations of the Manhattan landscape) will not stand the test of time. This branch of 9/11 truth research is naturally being vigorously attacked and billed as "disinformation" - as it contains the only tangible and repeatable proof of this murderous hoax : no one is going to prove HOW the towers fell or that a Norad standdown WAS ordered. This is what the perpetrators are counting on .
I am an audio-video professional who has spent many years researching 9/11, only to realize in early 2007 that I could contribute actively to the authentic truth search with my video-editing and audio processing skills.  less

NEW SEPTEMBER CLUES website:
www.septemberclues.info

On 9/11, the US TV networks used computer generated sceneries of Manhattan. The layering techniques and softwares used for these simulations   more...seemingly blended real and digital images - but the EXACT way this was done is frankly not for us to define. However, the technology certainly exists and it is naive to think this was difficult/impossible to achieve.
In "CHOPPED OUT", I compare two shots - 11 minutes apart - both of them showing a reversing helicopter in the same corner of the screen and over very much the same spot of Manhattan. Additionally, both camera shots 'catch' the chopper at the end of a wide zoom out action.
The odds of all these similarities occuring in two distinct shots, 11 min apart in time are pretty close to nil. If you still believe it may be a "coincidence", I will let you believe this and you will have 'wasted' only 4 minutes of your life.
  less

In the new animated series, "Cowch Potatoes," Franklin and Tyrell discuss politics.

Hillary and Bill team up to spoof the final episode of "The Sopranos" set to Journey's "Don't Stop Believin."

Is Arnold Schwarzenegger the president? Is Esteban going to date Hillary Clinton? These questions will be answered!

A married couple spend a night with their baby, their dog, and watch President Hilary Clinton on television in their home in the not too distant future.

George Bush and Dick Cheney have made America lame. This is our music video for the 2008 Election. (To the tune of "Sexy Back")

You meet some interesting people in LA. They don't get much stranger then Adam.

Logo's Jason Bellini Interviews Hillary Clinton

This is an old but funny clip of Letterman insulting Ann Coulter.

Hillary Clinton in NH talking about the "vast rightwing conspiracy."

What if you had complete control over a politician? haha Hilarious commercial...certainly not from the US