<a href="http://www.emfnews.org/chipcategory.html">EMF Protection Products</a>
<a href="http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html">Airtube Headsets</a>
<a href="http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html">Cell   more...Tower Protection</a>

CELL PHONE RADIATION STUDIES

In general, all of us MUST keep in mind that the human body is an electrical system. It will be, and is affected by, outside RF energy fields that can promote unwanted nerve stimulation, cancer, heating effects, and many other unwanted effects.

A comparison table for telephone effective radiation head exposure has been developed to provide reference values. [4] This value varies considerably for dozens of different cell phone models tested. DNA breakdown is among the most disturbing findings of studies done, which can lead to illness and tumors. There are now new links to brain cancer being uncovered as you read this. There is new concern over those that wear cell phones on their belts, because of the close proximity of the antenna to kidneys. The liver which can rebuild itself to some degree after being damaged, but your kidneys cannot.

One notices that RF exposure studies in the media from Europe are much more common and considerably more vocal than those done in America. Publishing negative study results in North America will have a negative effect on the billion dollar market, and subsequently affect stock in cell phone companies. Cell companies have managed to keep the lid nailed shut on the box, in so far as mainstream media are concerned, but this can only last for so long. I personally was not convinced of the damage potential of low level RF radiation for more than 20 years. That is, until reading a number of test results, all saying very much the same thing
about observed detrimental effects on living organisms.
<a href="http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html">Airtube Headsets</a>  less

<a href="http://www.emfnews.org/chipcategory.html">EMF Protection Products</a>
<a href="http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html">Airtube Headsets</a>
<a href="http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html">Cell   more...Tower Protection</a>

Dr. George Carlo, the cellular industry's chief research scientist turned whistleblower, even initially recommended their use in his ground-breaking book, Cell Phones: Invisible Hazards in the Wireless Age. The idea behind hands-free sets is simple. The strength of radio wave radiation decreases rapidly with distance from the handset. Exposure from a mobile phone even ten centimetres from your head is far lower than if the phone is right against your ear. The mobile phone antenna is where the radiation plumes are emitted from, and keeping it away from the body will reduce the exposure.

But lately even this practice is being called into question. Currently, the cellular industry encourages the use of hands-free (headset or earpiece) kits only because it creates the public perception that it is safer, not because it really is. The only real advantage of a hands-free option is that it offers greater freedom of use to the user, nothing else.
The truth is -- hands-free kits are no guarantee of lowering radiation emissions from mobile phones. In some cases, they actually increase it!

While some recent tests have shown that using a hands-free device may reduce exposure of the head to EMF emissions by around 70 percent, this does nothing to protect the rest of the body. If you are wearing the phone at your waist, for example, important blood-cell producing tissues in the pelvic bones are now exposed to radiation -- as are your liver, kidneys, prostate, uterus, and ovaries. New research has shown that men who regularly carry their mobiles near the groin -- on a belt or in a pocket -- could potentially have their sperm count reduced by as much as 30 percent! Increased number of testicular cancer incidents are also being linked with this practice.
http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html
http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html  less

<a href="http://www.emfnews.org/chipcategory.html">EMF Protection Products</a>
<a href="http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html">Airtube Headsets</a>
<a href="http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html">Cell   more...Tower Protection</a>

Hands Free headsts DRIVERS UNDER 18
Q: Am I allowed to use my wireless telephone hands free?
A: NO. Drivers under the age of 18 may not use a wireless telephone, pager, laptop or any other electronic communication or mobile services device to speak or text while driving in any manner, even hands free. EXCEPTION: Permitted in emergency situations to call police, fire or medical authorities. (VC §23124).
Q: Why is the law stricter for provisional drivers?
A: Statistics show that teen drivers are more likely than older drivers to be involved in crashes because they lack driving experience and tend to take greater risks. Teen drivers are vulnerable to driving distractions such as talking with passengers, eating or drinking, and talking or texting on wireless phones, which increase the chance of getting involved in serious vehicle crashes.
Q: Can my parents give me permission to allow me to use my wireless telephone while driving?
A: NO. The only exception is an emergency situation that requires you to call a law enforcement agency, a health care provider, the fire department or other emergency agency entity.
Q: Does the law apply to me if I’m an emancipated minor?
A: Yes. The restriction applies to all licensed drivers who are under the age of 18.
Q: If I have my parent(s) or someone age 25 years or older in the car with me, may I use my wireless telephone while driving?
A: NO. You may only use your wireless telephone in an emergency situation.
Q: Will the restriction appear on my provisional license?
A: No
Q: May I use the hands-free feature while driving if my car has the feature built in?
A: NO. The law prohibits anyone under the age of 18 from using any type of wireless device while driving, except in an emergency situation.
http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html
http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html  less

<a href="http://www.emfnews.org/chipcategory.html">EMF Protection Products</a>
<a href="http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html">Airtube Headsets</a>
<a href="http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html">Cell   more...Tower Protection</a>

Cellular phones use electromagnetic radiation in the microwave range for wireless communication. When you use a cell phone, these EMF radiations are passing through your body. While the amount of radiation is miniscule, it has the potential to cause serious damage in long term usage. Let us face the facts: most of us are glued to our cell phones all day, hence the possibility of long term damage is inevitable.
Prolonged exposure to this radiation greatly increases the possibility of contracting cancer. EMF radiation has also been linked with brain cell damage and increased incidences of testicular cancer in men, and ovarian cancer in women. Pregnant mothers are cautioned not to use cell phones as it may affect their unborn child. The increase in cell phone usage has also resulted in a rash of driving fatalities.
One popular method of protecting oneself from the harmful effects of EMF radiation is by the use of wired headsets. These enable the user to talk freely yet at the same time keep the cell phone away from sensitive areas such as the brain. However, what most people fail to realise is that these wires may themselves conduct EMF radiation. In fact some studies have shown that they may actually increase the levels of EMF radiation being directed to the brain. One effective method of minimizing EMF radiation is through the use of Air Tube headsets.
Air tube headsets utilize an air-filled wireless tube to deliver crystal clear sound to the ear pieces. The absence of a wire negates the possibility of harmful EMF radiation affecting your body. These headsets also feature a tangle-free cord and a unique ear piece system that will let you communicate safely with your loved ones, even when you are driving. These units are ergonomically and stylishly designed, and best of all, the audio quality is vastly superior to conventional wired headsets.
l
http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html  less

http://www.Cellphonelies.com Watch as the tri-field meter measures emf radiation and wireless technology.
Some believe wireless technology is one of the causes of brain tumors , cancer and more.this little   more...description is about: About Brain Tumors
A tumor is a mass or growth of abnormal cells. Brain tumors typically are categorized as primary or secondary. Primary brain tumors (gliomas) originate in the brain and can be benign (slow growing) or malignant (fast growing). Secondary brain tumors (metastatic brain tumors), which are malignant, are more common. These tumors result from cancer that started elsewhere in the body and spread (metastasized) to the brain.
Brain tumors can be challenging to treat, but the outlook is not necessarily bleak. Many brain tumors can be successfully treated with one or more methods. In addition, new technology enables physicians to target tumors more precisely, while innovative treatments under investigation offer hope for the future. To learn more about the dangers of wireless technology go to http://www.CellphoneLies.com or go to www.emfnews.org for solutions  less

THANKS 4 THE ADD

http://www.emfnews.org <a href="http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html">Airtube Headset</a> The list of the group's concerns are primarily focused on research the cellular manufacturers   more...themselves came up with showing the risk of brain tumors. This research was apparently backed up by independent studies as well. Further information broke the results down to showing that use of cells for under ten years was less dangerous. Apparently for children, however, cell phones are particularly more insidious than for adults--and many kids today practically live on their beloved phones. Other concerns involved leaking of blood in the brain, damage to male fertility, and increased cell radiation strength in rural areas.McAllen, Texas Salt Lake City, Utah Montenegro, Podgorcia Charleston, South Carolina Al Ghabam, United Arab Emirates, Al Ghabam, UAE Congo, Brazzaville Orange, California Central African Republic, Bangui Mackay, Queensland Congo, Democratic Republic of the Kinshasa<a href="http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html">Qlink Pendants</a> <a href="http://www.emfnews.org/products.html">Cell Phone Protection Products</a>  less

http://www.emfnews.org <a href="http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html">Airtube Headset</a> Cell phone radiation danger, cell phone radiation protection, cell phone radiation   more...levels, cell phone radiation cancer,cell phone radiation popcorn, cell phone cancer, iphone radiation,bluetooth radiation, doctor George carlo.<a href="http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html">Qlink Pendants</a> <a href="http://www.emfnews.org/products.html">Cell Phone Protection Products</a>  less

<a href="http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html">Airtube Headset</a> After ultrastructural examination, a predominance of microfollicles with less colloid content and dilated blood   more...capillaries wa s found in the EMF group. Stereological counting showed a statistically signi?cant increase of the volume density of follicular epithelium, interfollicular tissue and blood capillaries as well as the thyroid activation index, as compared to the controls. The volume density of colloid signi?cantly decreased. Ultrastructural analysis of thyroid follicular cells in the EMF group revealed the frequent ?nding of several colloid droplets within the same thyrocyte with the occasional presence of large-diameter droplets. Alterations in lysosomes, granular endoplasmic reticulum and cell nuclei compared to the control group were also observed. Ta ke n together, both the light microscope and the ultrastructural results show the stimulating effect of power–frequency EMFs.<a href="http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html">Qlink Pendants</a>  less

<a href="http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html">Airtube Headset</a> The results obtained in animal studies cannot be understood by psychological or psychiatric theories, bu t   more...are clearly related to the EMF exposure. In view o f recent epidemiological studies, pointing to a correlation between long-term exposure from power-frequency magnetic ?elds or radio/microwave s and cancer, our data have to be taken seriously.<a href="http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html">Qlink Pendants</a>  less

<a href="http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html">Airtube Headset</a> Turning back to the immune system, Anane et al. [44] have studied the effects of acute exposure to GSM-900   more...microwave s (900 MHz, 217 Hz pulse modulation) on the clinical parameters of the acute experimental allergic encephalomyelitis (EAE) model in rats in two independent experiments: rats were either habituated or non-habituated to the exposure restrainers. EAE wa s induced with a mixture of myelin basic protein and Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Female Lewis rats were divided into cage control, sham-exposed, and two groups exposed either at 1.5 or 6.0 W/kg local speci?c absorption rate (SAR averaged ove r the brain) using a loop antenna placed ove r their heads. No effect of a 21-day exposure (2 h/day) on the onset, duration, and termination of the EAE crisis wa s seen.<a href="http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html">Qlink Pendants</a>  less

<a href="http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html">Airtube Headset</a> In addition to the studies in humans, we have also done a series of animal experiments [6–8] . These have been   more...a collaborative effort between the Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Novi Sad, Serbia, and my ow n research group at the Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden. These papers go back to early observations in persons with EHS where large increases in the cutaneous mast cell count could be demonstrated as compared to normal healthy volunteers. A corresponding effect on cutaneous mast cells from normal healthy volunteers placed in front of ordinary TVs/PCs could also be shown. My working hypothesis since then is that EHS is a kind of radiation damage, since the observed cellular changes are very much the same as the ones you would ?nd in tissue subjected to UV-light or ionizing radiation (for refs., see above).<a href="http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html">Qlink Pendants</a>  less

<a href="http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html">Airtube Headset</a> Childhood leukemia wa s connected to power-frequency magnetic ?elds already in the pioneering work by Wertheimer   more...and Leeper [36] . More recently, Scandinavian scientists have identi?ed an increased risk for acoustic neuroma (i.e., a benign tumour of the eighth cranial nerve) in cell phone users, as well as a slightly increased risk of malignant brain tumours such as astrocytoma and meningioma on the same side of the brain as the cell phone wa s held [37–40] . I n addition, a clear association between adult cancers and FM radio broadcasting radiation has been noticed, both in time and location [41–43] . Initial studies on facial nevi indicate that nowadays young children can have a substantial number of these (Hallberg and Johansson, unpublished data). If, in addition to the lowfrequency EMF, there is a radiofrequency and/or microwave correlation, then this must be considered in future research and safety programs.<a href="http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html">Qlink Pendants</a>  less

<a href="http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html">Air tube Headset</a> http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.htmlAre Air tube headsets really effective and safe to use? Check out ours that   more...have a 30 day money back guarantee.<a href="http://www.emfnews.org/products.html">Cell Phone Protection Products</a>  less

<a href="http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html">Air tube Headset</a> http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.htmlAir tube headsets , bluetube headsets, rf3 head sets are the same headsets   more...but are they really a good alternative? <a href="http://www.emfnews.org/products.html">Cell Phone Protection Products</a>  less

<a href="http://www.emfnews.org">Cell Tower Radiation</a>http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.htmlIt is usually considered that any frequency above TV channel 83 is microwave. There's   more...a "fuzzy" line between microwave and non-microwave radio signals. In truth, the higher channels of the UHF band in America are thought to be the near microwave band. Radio signals operating with short wavelengths measured in centimeters, can increase the temperature of water and tissues at a distance. Though most of the people compare this only with microwave ovens, this effects occurs at lower frequencies. Complicated proteins present in blood also break down into poisonous materials.These invisible, toxic compounds may cause skyrocketing muscle, joint and nerve agony in folk over time as poisons build up in the body. Many of us have put their microwave ovens on the curb, when they discovered their agony was linked to microwaved food. http://www.emfnews.org  less

<a href="http://www.emfnews.org/cell-phone-radiation-book.html">Educational Cell Phone Ebook</a>http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html In Canada, 71 per cent of youth between the ages   more...of 12 and 19 have a cellphone, according to new data compiled by Toronto-based Solutions Research Group. The penetration nears 80 per cent for this age bracket in Toronto and Vancouver, where cells are seen as an essential social tool as well as a matter of safety for parents, according to the research firm specializing in the youth market.Solutions Research Group estimates that among nine- to 12-year-olds, one in four own cellphones. Also, their research shows 70 per cent of mothers with tweens share the cellphone with their kids occasionally for calls, texts or games.Overall, there are 21.5 million Canadian wireless phone subscribers, representing a national wireless penetration rate of 67 per cent. And half of all phone connections in Canada are now wireless, according to the Canadian Wireless Telecommunications Association. A spokesman from that agency, Marc Choma, said these subscribers, including=20 parents of younger user s, need to look at all the evidence about the safety of cellphones rather than cherry-picking a few.http://www.emfnews.org  less

<a href="http://www.emfnews.org/cell-phone-radiation-book.html">Educational Cell Phone Ebook</a>http://www.emfnews.orgRelyea found that a mixture of all 10 chemicals killed   more...99 percent of Leopard Frog tadpoles as did the insecticide-only mixture; the herbicide mixture had no effect on the tadpoles. While Leopard Frogs perished, Gray Treefrogs did not succumb to the poisons and instead flourished in the absence of Leopard Frog competitors.Relyea also discovered that endosulfan—a neurotoxin banned in several nations but still used extensively in U.S. agriculture—is inordinately deadly to Leopard Frog tadpoles. By itself, the chemical caused 84 percent of the Leopard Frogs to die. This lethality was previously unknown because current regulations from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) do not require amphibian testing, Relyea said. His results showed that endosulfan was not only highly toxic to leopard frogs, but also that it served as the linchpin of the pesticide mixture that eliminated the bulk of leopard frog tadpoles.http://www.emfnews.org  less

<a href="http://www.emfnews.org/cell-phone-radiation-book.html">Educational Cell Phone Ebook</a>http://www.emfnews.orgA long-term feeding study commissioned by the Austrian Agency   more...for Health and Food Safety confirms genetically modified (GM) corn seriously affects reproductive health in mice. Non-GMO advocates, who have warned about this infertility link along with other health risks, now seek an immediate ban of all GM foods and GM crops to protect the health of humankind and the fertility of women around the world.Feeding mice with genetically modified corn developed by the US-based Monsanto Corporation led to lower fertility and body weight, according to the study conducted by the University of Veterinary Medicine in Vienna. Lead author of the study Professor Zentek said there was a direct link between the decrease in fertility and the GM diet, and that mice fed with non-GE corn reproduced more efficiently.Other studies have also found that offspring of rats fed GM soy showed a five-fold increase in mortality, lower birth weights, and the inability to reproduce. http://www.emfnews.org  less

<a href="http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html">Cell Tower Protection</a>
<a href="http://www.emfnews.org/cell-phone-radiation-book.html">Educational
Cell Phone Ebook</a>Senator's   more...Wife Did Not Receive Favors, Campaign Says
By James V. Grimaldi
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, October 16, 2008; A06
Early in 2007, just as her husband launched his presidential bid, Cindy McCain sought to resolve an old problem -- the lack of cellphone coverage on her remote 15-acre ranch near Sedona, Ariz., nestled deep in a tree-lined canyon called Hidden Valley.
Over the past year, she offered land for a permanent cell tower, and Verizon Wireless embarked on an expensive public process to meet her needs, hiring contractors and seeking county land-use permits.
Verizon ultimately abandoned its effort to install a permanent tower in August. Company spokesman Jeffrey Nelson said the project would be "an inappropriate way" to build its network. "It doesn't make business sense for us to do that," he added.
Instead, Verizon delivered a portable tower known as a "cell site on wheels" -- free of charge -- to the McCain property in June, after the Secret Service began inquiring about improving coverage in the area. Such devices are used for providing temporary capacity where coverage is lacking or has been knocked out, in circumstances ranging from the Super Bowl to hurricanes.
In July, AT&T followed suit, wheeling in a portable tower for free to match Verizon's offer. "This is an unusual situation," AT&T spokeswoman Claudia B. Jones said. "You can't have a presidential nominee in an area where there is not cell coverage."
<a href="http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html">Cell Tower Protection</a>  less

<a href="http://www.emfnews.org/chipcategory.html">EMF Protection Products</a>
<a href="http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html">Airtube Headsets</a>
Here's one way   more...for a cash-strapped district to make a little extra pocket change: Allow a cell phone company to erect cell phone towers at your schools.
The Anoka-Hennepin school board has approved three such towers, which would be operated by the T-Mobile communications company. The 100-foot-tall towers could be put up as early as a year from now if T-Mobile gets approval from the three communities in which the towers would be located.
If the plan passes muster, payoff for the district will be at least $1,500 a month per site. It could be more if T-Mobile subleases its tower space to another company, said Chuck Holden, Anoka-Hennepin director of administrative services.
Other school districts have been renting out cell phone tower space for up to a decade. Paul Harrington, whose St. Paul-based Carlson & Harrington consulting firm negotiated the T-Mobile agreement with Anoka-Hennepin, said he has negotiated tower agreements with such districts as Osseo, White Bear Lake, Hastings and Stillwater.
"We have a number of agreements in place with schools," he said. "They view it as a revenue opportunity." Schools, with their spacious grounds, are often good sites for such towers because there are often zoning restrictions requiring them to be specified distances from homes, Harrington said.
The new Champlin Park tower would also be attached to a football field light pole. In the case of the other two schools, the towers would be freestanding structures behind the schools.
<a href="http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html">Cell Tower Protection</a>
<a href="http://www.emfnews.org/cell-phone-radiation-book.html">Educational
Cell Phone Ebook</a>  less

<a href="http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html">Airtube Headsets</a>
<a href="http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html">Cell Tower Protection</a>
A new bill has been   more...presented to the Israel Parliament (the Knesset) proposing to limit the use of and sales of cell phones to children. The bill was filed by MPs Dov Hanin Michael Malchior with nine other MPs. According to the new bill, any advertising of mobile phones will need to include a warning taking up 5% of the advertisement page. Children will not be permitted to be shown in the advertisement and such advertisements cannot therefore be directed towards children. Moreover, children will not legally be able to buy themselves a cell phone (unless they are accompanied by an adult). Furthermore, cell phones will not be able to be legally sold without a warning. The warning will say, on a patch of at least the size of 5 cm, "Warning! The health ministry warns that heavy usage and the carrying of the device close to the body can increase the risk of cancer, especially among children." Warnings regarding the dangers will be posted at the sales centers of cell phones, services centers, and on the companies' websites. <a href="http://www.emfnews.org/cell-phone-radiation-book.html">Educational
Cell Phone Ebook</a>
<a href="http://www.emfnews.org/chipcategory.html">EMF Protection Products</a>  less

<a href="http://www.emfnews.org/chipcategory.html">EMF Protection Products</a>
<a href="http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html">Airtube Headsets</a>
8 Questions   more...to ask a City Council about cell phone masts before they are erected.
I have eight questions for Dublin City Council regarding phone masts on top of Northside Swimming Pool.
As a former resident of Kilmore West, and someone whose family still lives in the area, I would also like to register my protest, in the strongest possible way, against the presence of approximately 50 mobile phone masts on top of the Northside Shopping Centre pool.
I believe their presence is an attack on the health of the men, women and children in the immediate and surrounding areas. A number of independent studies have linked increases in childhood leukaemia, breast cancer, brain tumours, Alzheimer's disease, neurological disorders, chronic fatigue, anxiety and depression to the radio frequency radiation generated by these devices.
Aside from the threat to people's health, I can see no technical or commercial justification for these masts. In light of this, I think the people of Coolock and the whole of Dublin have the right to know the answers to the following questions:
1. Exactly how many masts are on top of the Northside Swimming Pool?
2. Which companies do the masts belong to?
3. How long has each mast been on top of the building (ie the dates when each one was erected)?
4. What is their purpose?
5. What is the strength of signal coming from this building?
6. What consultation, if any, took place with the local community before these masts were erected?
7. What risk assessment was undertaken, and if so, what was the nature of it?
8. What payment have Dublin City Council received from each company for allowing the masts to be erected?
<a href="http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html">Cell Tower Protection</a>
<a href="http://www.emfnews.org/cell-phone-radiation  less

<a href="http://www.emfnews.org/chipcategory.html">EMF Protection Products</a>
<a href="http://www.emfnews.org/headset.html">Airtube Headsets</a>
Many of us   more...enjoy an occasional bedtime chat with a loved one who is far away. But as more and more people trade in their landlines for mobile phones, they may find that these late-night conversations are no longer a good idea. According to recent studies, cell phone signals can alter brain waves—and the consequences will keep you up at night.
Neuroscientist Rodney Croft and his col­leagues at Swinburne University of Technology in Australia strapped a Nokia 6110 cell phone to the heads of 120 men and women and then monitored their brain waves. When the re­search­ers switched on the phone without the subjects’ knowledge, they saw a sudden power boost in the volunteers’ alpha brain waves. Alpha waves normally surge as the mind shuts out the external world and spins internal thoughts. Croft believes the heightened alpha waves reflect the mind concentrating to overcome the electrical interference in brain circuits caused by the pulsed microwave radiation from cell phones.
In a different study, sleep researchers at Loughborough University in England found that after a 30-minute exposure to cell phone signals in talk mode, people took nearly twice as long to fall asleep as they did when the phone had been off or in standby mode. The scientists think the effect probably reflects the time it takes the brain to relax after being agitated by the phone’s electrical field.
James Horne, one of the study’s authors, cautions that the effects are harmless and less disruptive to sleep than half a cup of coffee. Still, he wonders, “With different doses, durations or other devices, would there be greater effects?”
<a href="http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html">Cell Tower Protection</a>
<a href="http://www.emfnews.org/cell-phone-radiation  less