Please check out my new website:

www.septemberclues.info

On 9/11, the US TV networks used computer generated sceneries of Manhattan. Multiple layering techniques and softwares were employed to simulate   more..."airplanes crashing into the World Trade Center". We now have conclusive evidence that the TV networks aired manipulated images live on 9/11. The subsequent so-called "amateur" videos were more sophisticated video composites yet all have now been exposed for what they are : total forgeries.  less

NEW SEPTEMBER CLUES website:
www.septemberclues.info

The analysis of the Naudet brother's 1st strike footage.
If someone asks you to see a video of the WTC exploding with no plane in it, here's your   more...best choice.
The Naudet footage is maybe the most diffused of all the 9/11 images so there is no possible question in regard to its "authenticity" - so to speak....as it is forged.
My analysis here has consisted - as usual - in slowing down the video, check it frame by frame and occasionally crop (enlarge) some shots to view the fine details. (As ever, I have of course NOT altered one single pixel of the material ). I wasn't able to perform this analysis earlier as the 4 versions I had of this famous footage were not as good resolution as this 5th version I recently found.
The graphic object diving into the tower appears to be transparent : I call it 'THE GLASS PLANE'. It really is a crass graphic insertion. No video compression will make a block of pixels change color entirely depending on the background it is cast against. But more, much more importantly :
MAIN EVIDENCE OF MISSING AIRPLANE :
We may observe that the visible (i.e. not covered by 1st explosion dust) right side of the tower remains intact until 6 seconds after impact . Indeed, we may see 30% of the (righthand) wall still INTACT for as long as 5SECONDS after impact. At the 6sec mark we see the ignition of the charges which eventually rip open the wide plane-shaped hole we all remember. As the explosive charges only manage to open a 130ft-wide gash, a problem arises for the perpetrators : a Boeing 767's wingspan is 156 feet. So, to fix this problem, the far right tip of the gash (representing 'plane's wingtip') gets penciled in digitally on the video to reach the approx160gash-width required to 'sell' the idea of a Boeing767 melting entirely into WTC 1.
The inescapable conclusion is that NO LARGE PASSENGER JET (if anything at all - yet a missile's still likely) crashed into the WTC1 or - for that matter - WTC2 (see SEPTEMBER CLUES). On a final note, if this most publicized and widespread 9/11 video has been THIS sloppily forged, it appears there were whistleblowers within the forgery crew - or else that crew was quite simply an incompetent bunch.
In my honest opinion, the plane/no plane debate is now over. Let's move on and see how this evidence can be brought to a court of law.  less

Mix it up... Check out <a href='http://www.911movement.org'>911movement.org</a> and also be sure to check out these great channels and websites!


, <a href='http://livevideo.com/genghis6199'>genghis</a>,   more...<a href='http://thewebfairy.com'>the webfairy</a>, <a href=http://coffinman.co.uk'>coffinman's blog</a> and <a href='http://livevideo.com/911revolution'>911 Revolution</a> <a href='http://livevideo.com/sarcastic17'>Sarcastic17</a> <a href='http://livevideo.com/genefire'>genefire</a> and <a href='http://total411.info'>Total411.info</a> <a href='http://livevideo.com/ewing2001'>ewing2001</a>  less

If only there were some way to know what the view in the park actually looked like on September 11, 2001. Were there trees planted there? Were there lampposts? If only we knew, then we would finally   more...have proof.  less

The fake footage that CNN aired on 9/11 is full of mistakes that you too can verify! For example, the explosion stands still from frames 279 thru 289. Of course, this is physically impossible. Not   more...only that, but as has been pointed out before, the airplane behaves in an impossible fashion, the camera angle makes no sense, whole skyscrapers are missing. But oh well. Deny TV fakery all you want. Pretend that it never happened. Stick your head in the sand. Believe in cartoons if you want to. It's still a free country.  less

The WTC seems to have been built on a giant revolving platter.

Note that the camera is zooming in on the gash on the south face of the South Tower allegedly caused by Flight 175 crashed into it and stays   more...zoomed on the south face for the entire time while the entire background looks like it's rotating around the WTC.

See <a href="http://killtown.blogspot.com/2007/05/spinning-wtc.html">blog post</a>.

(Credit to "Still Diggin" for find. http://911logic.blogspot.com )  less

Total Destruction of the 9/11 Myth created by the TV News Stations. Three fake features show clearly that the video is fake. Of course, there's more than three things wrong with the video, but this   more...is enough to show even the most die-hard fans of the official story that at least some of the TV Footage they showed over and over again was phoney. TV Fakery.  less

Can we all agree that both shots on the right hand side are fake? If not, for those of you who think an airplane crashed into the south tower, how many planes crashed into it? Pick one that you think   more...is the real UA 175. Then most of the other 36 videos are fake, including all of the ones that they aired on TV. If you think both videos on the right are real, you must have rather serious mental probems. All 4 videos are in sync and run at the exact same speed.  less

Asch Conformity and Milgram Obedience Experiments

Genghis6199 releases his greatest 911 tv fakery expose to date.

http://911taboo.blogspot.com
http://www.livevideo.com/genghis6199

http://www.megaupload.com/?d=8JGUBYAP

480 MB xvid with settings on max'
2500   more...kbps and 256 kb sound

http://www.youtube.com/genghis6199



911 Taboo Part 1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sNU6xU...


911 Taboo Part 2

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=18HqbZ...



911 Taboo Part 3

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KA26yO...



911 Taboo Part 4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HaIuPA...  less

Nobody wants to believe that CNN aired cartoons on 9/11. Maybe it's easier to believe that Manhattan turned invisible? The government animators left out some key buildings and got the perspective wrong.   more...Oops! Nice try, boys. Hope you like prison! Maybe Bush will pardon Libby, but who is going to pardon you? Time to get your immunity plea in order. Watch 911 Octopus. Check out coffinman, total411.info webfairy, ewing2001, conspicuous plot, 911 researchers, and genghis6199.  less

What made the fireball and debris freeze?

http://killtown.blogspot.com/2007/05/frozen-fireball.html

So, if you get your fake news from CNN, you should at least get the same fake news no matter where you watch CNN, right? Right? They wouldn't just air video that shows one thing, and then upload it   more...to their website with key features edited out, would they? Would they? Check out http://killtown.blogspot.com and try the TV Fakery Test.  less

Some things are controversial... If you're offended by profanity or suggestive imagery, please do not watch this clip.

So... I have just a few questions about some of the moving bridges and freestanding cyclones. Also, how did you get the smoke to spell 9-11? That was a cool effect, guys.

tv fakery was used and without the video proof its still obvious. here is one bit of proof that no planes struck the wtc on 9/11

Dan Rather Tribute. Check out Sarcastic17, Ewing2001,

Upcoming <a href='http://killtown.blogspot.com'>Killtown</a> Feature,
<a href='http://total411.info'>Total411.info</a> JaceyJako,   more...Spiney, Xenomorph, Genghis6199, Webfairy, The Rabbit Hole, <a href='http://www.coffinman.co.uk/'> Coffinman</a>and more! Thank you! Music by Evolution Control Committee featuring Dan Rather  less

No matter where you go, the angles just don't quite work. An open challenge to those who can't believe CNN was part of the operation: show where this footage was taken from and post it in a video here!

recreates the cnn ghostplane -

Nobody likes to share bad news. Loose Change is lots of fun, and Dylan Avery is a cute little media darling and internet superhero. But the stuff they say just plain isn't true. Sure, 911 was an Inside   more...Job, but they're deliberately LYING and CENSORING to keep the truth from coming out. Dylan attacked Killtown and said a bunch of stuff that is just plain UNTRUE. He's either a bad guy from the start or just too full of himself to see what's happened to him. Either way, he's helping the perps. I hate to say it, because I liked watching their earlier stuff, but SCREW LOOSE CHANGE! We don't need little fascist puppets masturbating over a supposed $25 million movie deal. There's a ton of hard 9/11 evidence, and Loose Change is designed to make a bunch of claims that send Truthlings everywhere but in the right direction. Check out Dylan's "facts" for yourself.  less

Can you tell real from fake?

They didn't hijack planes, they hijacked the airwaves! Four minutes before WTC2 exploded the terrorists were positioning the towers on screen for the fake plane overlay. They screwed up and even broadcast   more...the mask layer, causing the supervisor to pull the plug and fade to black!  less

Every day there's new progress. The Bush Administrations is weak and falling apart internally. No wonder they wanted to fire all the US Attorneys! They've gone through how many heads of the Intelligence   more...Agencies? It's all falling apart for them, and we're winning. The truth will be exposed.  less

The CNN Ghostplane clip is ridiculously bad. There's no perspective. There's no motion blur. The plane is always in focus. There are no crash physics evident. Yes, it's got that pretty CNN logo.   more... When you see that, you should immediately think "FAKE", because that's what they've been giving you for the PAST FIVE YEARS. Wake up.  less