LiveVideo.com - The World is Watching

Posted Jun 14, 08 by glad2bhere
I remember hearing about the murders shortly after they occurred, and seeing the press coverage in the months that followed. I read "Helter Skelter" and I saw the movie version, too. I think that of all those involved in the killings, Susan Atkins more...

Posted Jun 14, 08 by robin1957
So true Soho

Posted Jun 14, 08 by soho
It will be a moot point in a few week when she's dead.

Posted Jun 14, 08 by DaringDaver
An interesting question, Gary.

At the risk of being overly simplistic, there is a price to be paid for all that we endeavor to do in life. Hers has yet to be tendered, and if "real" justice were granted, your question would be moot.

My all-time favorite more...

Posted Jun 14, 08 by hundamit
she killed a woman and her unborn child...I for one would show her NO simpathy......
that baby didnt get a second chance nor did its Mother and Susan was the one that made sure of that.....
I wouldnt be worried about what she would do if she got out but more...

Posted Jun 14, 08 by robin1957
Susan Atkins has been denied parole 11 times. What is did was took anothers person life and the life of a child. She was young and on drugs when that happen. Also under the spell of Charlie.
Yes , I think she should be able to die at home. Have you seen more...

Posted Jun 14, 08 by RAMKING
Hmmm....shouldn't this opportunity be afforded to Charles Manson first? After all, Charles Manson didn't actually kill anyone with his own hands. Simply put, if Susan were a MAN she would never get this option. Also consider this - she gets free healthcare more...

Posted Jun 14, 08 by soho
Manson didn't kill anyone that we know of and can prove. But I would not be 100% sure that he didn't kill anyone.

Posted Jun 14, 08 by lmosack
I would have to say no,what if she gets out & then kills again.Then what.People were foolish to say ,oh she learned her lesson,let her out.A day or day goes by & she is out to kill more people.I stick to my story & say no.

Posted Jun 14, 08 by robin1957
She is able to kill anyone. She is dying.

Posted Jun 14, 08 by baileykix
You seem to forget that the Tate / LoBianco murders were not motivated by anything like need or desparation. These crimes were committed simply because they could (be committed). There was simply no reason for it. Imagine the horrible desparation Sharon more...

Posted Jun 13, 08 by 30andout
No.

Judgment was passed more than 30 years ago. Some would consider Life a bargain for a cold-blooded death. This recent development aside, has anything else changed overnight regarding conditions of parole?

Posted Jun 13, 08 by soho
I can see both sides of this issue, and thank you for your opinion. Thus far, I see that people are 50/50 split in their opinions, and I'm very interested in hearing what everyone has to say.