|
|
 |
|
| | How often to do you get to save lives on a Monday morning? | | | Sunday, July 6, 2008 (7:16 PM)
(I'm feeling other mood) | | My friend Diane, also known as Gallaxey, has asked me to post
the following information in a bulletin tomorrow, but ...
seeing as how I probably won't be on LiveVideo until late in the day,
I'm posting this entry in lieu of the bulletin.
If you'd like to know more please contact Diane.
(I'd also suggest subscribing to her blog.)
Oh ... one more thing.
Let's all make the damn phone call, please.
It's not time consuming, it's not expensive,
and if enough of us get off our gluteals to do it,
we might save lives. How often do you get to save lives on Monday morning?
"We are asking concerned American citizens to
CALL MONDAY MORNING, July 7, 2008,
to express your concerns at this critical hour.
PLEASE DON'T WAIT! THEIR LIVES COULD BE IN YOUR HANDS.
Secretary of the Interior Dick Kempthorne (202-208-3100)
Director of the Bureau of Land Management Jim Caswell
(202-208-3801)"
| | | 54 Views | 4  Thumbs Up | 2 Comments |  |
|
|
| | RESPONSE to ZackRepair | | | Thursday, June 26, 2008 (8:12 PM)
(I'm feeling other) | | (To all those who have watched, hit, and/or commented on my videos,
particularly the last two, THANK YOU!
And, I apologize for being so slow to reply to your comments.
I've not had much time to be on line this week, but I'm hoping to catch up over the weekend.
Meanwhile, please know how grateful I am for your support.)
A response to a response to a response to a perceived attack:
Hey, Zack! I watched the response you made to my video ...
which was itself a response to the four videos you and your wife, Jen,
had already made on the same subject matter.
That's a shitload of long-ass videos for folks to sit through,
so I'm fixing to bore 'em in a different way this time --- by responding with a blog entry.
Simply leaving a comment on your video seemed disrespectful to the situation
because there's not enough space to allow for what I believe is a decent rejoinder.
And, of course, comments can always be deleted.
I want my reply to stand in public, for anyone to read.
By placing it here, permanently on my channel, I own it and own up to it --
taking full responsibility for every word.
I'll try to keep this verbal thrill ride brief as possible.
Please bear with me, sir. English is my first language,
but you'd never know it by the way I write. ;-)
First off ----
I've never said that I want you to be taking a dirt nap.
How you got such a notion into your head, I can't imagine,
but you repeated it several times, therefore I'm assuming you actually believe it's true.
IT'S NOT though. I've never wished death on anybody. Death wishes are karmic suicide.
Death threats are downright criminal and I don't make those either.
I say so just in case that's the next peculiar idea you get.
My sincere wishes for you and your family are longevity and happiness.
Second ---
you seem to believe that I was trying to convince you and possibly others
to share my opinion of Mac. I was not.
I merely expressing my own feelings toward him and explaining the nature of our relationship
so folks would have a better understanding how we behaved in this situation.
When I told Mac about Kierri, I wasn't calling out an attack dog as you and your wife have implied.
I was sharing my distress with a cherished friend.
To you, he's MethodOfMac, cyber ganglord of the heinous Inner Circle.
To me, he's just Mac, a wonderful man, and in my heart, my brother.
If I had any personal message for you regarding Mac, it would be this:
attack him and you are attacking me.
That's how I take it because such is my loyalty to kin.
Might seem like an extreme position to you folks, but where I come from, it's normal.
Third ---
you seem to be implying that 'making judgements' is an improper thing to do.
Another absurd notion, in my opinion.
Making judgements is neither right nor wrong, but it is essential to human life.
In order to survive, we must make rational judgements about the world around us.
For example, we make judgements about behavior.
We must decide which behaviors are right and which are wrong in order to decide
which behaviors we will engage in. We make judgements about the truth value of information,
in order to decide what we will believe. Rational judgements are the predicate
for rational actions.
Fourth ---
in my judgement, when you and your wife accuse Kierri of being
such a morally and psychologically twisted creature that she'd keep her own mama sick
and confined to bed for the sake of making money, you are doing a reprehensible thing.
An Evil thing.
You two should know that these vile allegations have gotten back to Kierri's mama.
In order for your allegations to be true, Miz' Jessyca would have to be either a total dumbass
or so mentally weakened by her ailments that she's incapable of the rational thought necessary
to comprehend the circumstances in which she lives.
SHE IS NEITHER ONE, folks. Neither one.
Furthermore, the lady advises you to do a little research into the British system
of health care and social policy. If you follow her advice, you will discover that
when an ailing person is being cared for by a family member,
their benefits are actually DE-creased.
Do you see how that reality negates your rumor?
Do you realize what your rumor reveals about you?
| | | | 193 Views | 30 Thumbs Up | 15 Comments | |
|
|
| | Congrats To The Community, Invitation To Brad Kronen | | | Friday, June 20, 2008 (3:03 PM)
(I'm feeling other mood) | | Major props and gratitude are due to everyone who particpated in
the successful Jihad to have Mac's videos restored.
I want to personally thank all the folks who stopped by to hit and comment on
'Showtime Redux' which was the re-posting of Mac's video to my channel.
You, all of you, who reposted and/or supported 'Charlatan'
are responsible for pushing this issue onto the site's ranking pages,
thereby bringing community pressure to bear on the admins
and getting concrete results for taking action. Congratulations!
But ... as usual, the community received no explanation for what happened
and IMO, what happened here raises many interesting questions
about the Terms Of Service, access to the admins,
and also the nature of the relationship between LV and the individual member
who was discussed in 'Charlatan' and 'Some Variant'.
I'd like to speak to that individual myself,
as one professional Tarot reader to another,
but his live room is 'friends' only and he hasn't accepted my friend invitation.
I wonder why.
Why would an experienced, legitimate professional person object to
a reasonable, respectful public discussion of issues which pertain to
our mutual line of work? I think a number of foks in this community might be
interested in such an exchange, and I know I am.
Mr. Kronen has just been sent another friend invitation from me
and by posting this entry, I'm requesting the opportunity to
chat with him in his live room. Soon.
| | | | 149 Views | 27 Thumbs Up | 17 Comments | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
