|
|
 |
| | This video channel does not have a default video.
You can view any of the videos on this channel by clicking on a video link below.
|
| |
| | Monday, December 10, 2007 at 2:56 PM | | | |
| Thursday, December 6, 2007 at 2:33 PM | | DECEMBER | |
| Thursday, November 1, 2007 at 8:47 AM | | NOVEMBER! | |
| Tuesday, October 16, 2007 at 3:48 PM | | AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAEGGGGGGGGGH | |
| Monday, September 17, 2007 at 10:17 AM | | AHHH RETRO | |
| |
|
| | | | | |  | sparrowhawk 
01:38
The sparrowhawk is a yellow eyed hawk
with short, rounded wings and a long
dark striped tail. The male sparrowhawk tercel (formerly musket)
is about more...30cm long. The female (hawk) is bigger and measures about
38cm. The male sparrowhawk has a brownish back and wings, and has characteristic dark striped underparts.
Another distinguishing feature of the female sparrowhawk is the white stripe behind each eye. Both the male and the female have a wingspan of approximately 66cm.
The sparrowhawk has yellow legs and strong talons in which to carry prey. Its hooked beak enables the sparrowhawk to tear prey into pieces small enough to swallow. As its name suggests the sparrowhawk preys mostly on small birds. It also eats small mammals and insects.
Sparrowhawks, like all birds of prey, create a small parcel of those parts of
their prey, such as fur, bones and feathers, which they find to be
indigestible. This is called a pellet. They
regurgitate these and they may be found
on the ground near their eating place.
The nest of the sparrowhawk is made of twigs and sticks and is lined with dead leaves. The nest is bulky and is usually built 10–12 metres above the ground in a tree. A clutch of four to six eggs is laid
which are greenish-white with brown streaks. Young sparrowhawks have a
voracious appetite, and need to eat two to three ‘sparrow-sized’ birds each day.
less
Added: Jan 14, 09
Channel: huddersfieldBadgers
Views: 1,597
Category: Pets & Animals |
| | | | | | | | | | |  | SEPTEMBER CLUES NEW 1st half
41:45
Please check out my new website:
www.septemberclues.info
On 9/11, the US TV networks used computer generated sceneries of Manhattan. Multiple layering more...techniques and softwares were employed to simulate "airplanes crashing into the World Trade Center". We now have conclusive evidence that the TV networks aired manipulated images live on 9/11. The subsequent so-called "amateur" videos were more sophisticated video composites yet all have now been exposed for what they are : total forgeries. less
Added: Aug 12, 08
Channel: socialservice
Views: 20,365
Category: Science & Technology |
|  | SEPTEMBER CLUES NEW 2nd half
49:59
Please check out my new website:
www.septemberclues.info
The myriad of theories surrounding 9/11 have served the perpetrators well for over 7 years, more...giving the false impression freedom of speech was alive and well but ultimately spreading an almost mindnumbing confusion.
Most "911truth" organizations are run by the same people who organised this sham. This in order to 'control' the opposition, for as long as possible, in the hope it would all fade away one day in the public consciousness.
As most theories have built on the false assumption that airplanes were involved, the 'plane' myth has held strong - in spite of the widespread understanding no airliner crashed at the Pentagon or in Shanksville.
The misheld belief that 'thousands of Newyorkers' saw passenger planes crash into the twin towers is upheld solely by the relentless pounding of the mainstream media, the higher levels of which have complied to the requirements of this military false-flag operation.
Virtually all firsthand witnesses to the first "plane" were newspeople as shown in SEPTEMBER CLUESpart D. As for the second "plane", MOST witnesses on the street reported 'a SMALL PLANE' or even 'A MISSILE' . These reports were actually aired on the day but never again. Of course, a plane-shaped cruise missile with wings and tail section (such as a JASSM cruise missile) would be perceived as a 'small plane' to most people :in fact, a study of 12000 pages of testimonies has determined the majority of eyewitnesses reported a small aircraft - NOT a large airliner.
In SEPTEMBER CLUES part F we see that the alleged authors of the "amateur" videos ALSO were people linked to the newsmedia / film and video industry. All of those clips are, by now, proven forgeries : Many turn out to be simply cropped duplicates of the same composite, while most disqualify each other by the way of unconcilable differences : trajectories, angles, pitch, yaw, speeds, lighting, hues - you name it. The few clips showing the actual 'plane' penetration depict a wide body (aluminum) airliner penetrating the steel-frame tower effortlessly without even the brittle tail section breaking off. This is of course utterly absurd and makes a joke of the laws of physics.
The current reluctance of most people to recognize and accept this research is - in many ways - understandable, the foremost cause being the massive conditioning power of the mainstream newsmedia.
However, the many mistakes made by the authors of these crude fabrications (which included digital simulations of the Manhattan landscape) will not stand the test of time. This branch of 9/11 truth research is naturally being vigorously attacked and billed as "disinformation" - as it contains the only tangible and repeatable proof of this murderous hoax : with no rubble to analyze and only speculation to go on, no one is going to prove HOW 3 towers collapsed nor IF or WHY a Norad standdown was ordered. On the other hand, the evidence of TV fakery cannot be suppressed no matter how hard the perpetrators may try.
There is no such thing as 'the perfect crime'. less
Added: Aug 12, 08
Channel: socialservice
Views: 10,702
Category: News |
| |
| |
|
|
There are no photos on this channel yet.
|
|
|
There are no forum topics on this channel yet.
|
| |
|
|
